- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Teen taking selfie by train: ‘Wow, that guy just kicked me in the head’
- Goodbye, Afghanistan — hello, Africa: Air Force sees resource shift as U.S. exits Middle East
- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
- Law firm that cleared N.J. Gov. Christie in ‘Bridgegate’ gave 10K to RGA, which he heads
D.C. spending bill advances with no new riders
A D.C. spending bill passed the first of two hurdles this week when it emerged from a Senate subcommittee without any amendments that would restrict local officials from spending city money on controversial social programs.
The bill heads for the full Senate Committee on Appropriations on Thursday, after members of the financial services subcommittee did not attach any amendments, or riders, prohibiting spending on locally funded abortions, needle exchanges or other programs.
However, D.C. home rule advocates remain guarded against restrictions passed down from Capitol Hill. Earlier this year, officials girded for intrusions on the city’s burgeoning medical marijuana program or online gambling through the D.C. Lottery, although neither has been touched by Congress so far.
One such rider, to prevent the District from using federal and local dollars to fund abortions for low-income women, was included in a short-term spending measure in April and also submitted by the House Appropriations Committee over the summer.
The House bill also forbids the District from using federal dollars for its medical marijuana program or needle exchange.
Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas, the ranking Republican on the Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government, said Wednesday he is uncertain if any of his colleagues plan to introduce an abortion rider during the full committee mark-up of the Senate’s version, but he noted he has supported such measures in the past.
Asked if other riders could be expected, he said, “None that I’ve been made aware of.”
The Senate bill cuts its funding to the District by nearly 6 percent compared to fiscal year 2011, part of across-the-board cuts to federal agencies and programs.
By comparison, the House bill cuts funding to the District by almost 10 percent.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Pelosi to speak at Bard commencement, Bachmann at Oral Roberts
- Minnesota the latest to employ Deloitte to fix Obamacare tech issues
- Law firm that cleared N.J. Gov. Christie in 'Bridgegate' gave 10K to RGA, which he heads
- New debate: Should Congress use technology to spend less time in D.C.?
- Americans prefer Democrats' approach to health care: poll
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By returning to Christian roots, the nation can achieve greatness once again
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- U.S. military on high alert as Ukraine troops trade gunfire with pro-Russian militants
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
- Josh Romney swipes Harry Reid with photo tweet of dad paying taxes 'your paycheck'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.