- Extra-time goal gives Germany World Cup title over Argentina
- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration
- White House urges GOP to act ‘urgently’ on $3.7 billion request for illegal immigrants
- Politicians, criminals using ‘right-to-be-forgotten’ law EU courts forced upon Google
- Combat fatigue: elite special forces troops are ‘fraying,’ Gen. Joseph Votel warns
- German foreign minister to meet Kerry to discuss spying claims
Study: Shoddy background checks hinder job-hunters
Dubious companies digging up faulty data
Question of the Day
Thousands of U.S. job-hunters are losing out because employers use faulty background-check data drawn from shoddy records, consumer advocates say in a new report.
Those advocates want the government to make sure people know what information prospective employers see so errors can be corrected and abusive companies can be held responsible.
Use of criminal-background data is exploding as the economy struggles back from the worst job crisis in decades, the National Consumer Law Center said in the report, which is being released Wednesday. To meet surging demand, countless dubious companies have sprouted up, the study contended.
"It's the Wild West for background-screening report companies," said Persis Yu, lead writer of the report. "They're generating billions in revenue, but they have little or no accountability."
Nearly three-fourths of companies conduct criminal background checks for some job applicants, according to a 2010 study by the Society for Human Resource Management. They buy criminal-background data from providers of all sizes, including national names such as Lexis-Nexis, as well as upstarts that could include "anyone with a computer, an Internet connection and access to records," the report said.
Data providers obtain information from online public records, private vendors, jails and police blotters, it said. Sloppy handling of that data can cause a search on one person to turn up a rap sheet about someone with a similar name, for example.
Other common errors include displaying criminal records that were supposed to be sealed or wiped clean, misclassifying minor offenses as major crimes and listing charges that have been dismissed, according to the report.
The information is more widely available in part because local law-enforcement agencies are selling it to raise money, the group said. It said some data providers refuse to correct errors, even when people can document inaccuracies.
That's not an option for many people, Ms. Yu said, because employers often ignore laws requiring them to let people correct any false, negative information before making a hiring decision.
"It's a source of confusion for many employers," she said, and the law is hard to enforce because it's impossible to know why a person's job application was rejected.
Further muddying the picture, data providers aren't registered with the government, so it's impossible to get a full picture of the industry, Ms. Yu said.
The report is the first in-depth survey of consumer practices by private companies that sell questionable personnel dossiers.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has the authority to write rules governing data companies under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the law governing credit-report companies. Advocates wants the agency to make data providers update their records annually, prohibit matches based only on name and take other steps aimed at making them more accurate.
The CFPB has added credit-report companies to the list of companies it will supervise closely. It has not discussed regulating consumer-data providers.
The National Consumer Law Center also wants the Federal Trade Commission to investigate data providers and employers to make sure they are complying with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
TWT Video Picks
By Robert N. Tracci
Congress must use its appropriations power to secure the border
- DOJ investigates Nebraska parade float critical of Obama
- Agency scrubs Malia Obama photos at White House's request: report
- A 'new Cold War': China's top paper warns of 'slippery slope' towards conflict with U.S.
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Emeryville, Calif., police chief: Guns aren't for defense
- Pentagon's self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- New York City creates ID card so 500K illegal immigrants can get services
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- CURL: The hypocrisy of Obama's 15-day Vineyard vacation
- Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi formerly a U.S. captive
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs