- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
Pentagon’s caginess over N. Korean launch puzzles experts
Question of the Day
The Pentagon’s hesitance has piqued the curiosity of some experts.
“Their own data shows very clearly that, yes, the satellite is in orbit,” Harvard University astrophysicist Jonathan McDowellsaid, noting that the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) issued a statement confirming the launch’s success. “I don’t understand what’s motivating [the Pentagon’s hesitance] Perhaps not wanting to say anything positive about North Korea.”
A Pentagon spokeswoman said Thursday that there were no updates on Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s comments Wednesday to CNN. He said U.S. officials were still looking at the “final stage” to determine if the North Koreans had succeeded in launching a satellite with a three-stage rocket.
Mr. McDowell said space surveillance data show four objects in orbit associated with the North Korean launch — the satellite that was affixed to the rocket and presumably debris from the rocket’s final stage, a common occurrence for any satellite launch.
The astrophysicist said it is less clear whether the North Korean weather satellite is working properly or “tumbling out of control,” as NBC News reported a U.S. official as saying late Wednesday.
North Korea had announced it would launch the satellite between Dec. 10 and Dec. 22 to commemorate the first anniversary of the death of former leader Kim Jung-il, who died Dec. 17. But North Korean officials later said the launch window had been extended to Dec. 29 so that engineers could work on some technical issues.
The launch late Tuesday surprised many observers.
“The U.S. appears to have been caught flat-footed by the test,” Jonathan Pollack, a senior fellow for the Brookings Institution, wrote Wednesday.
Noting that North Korean officials had extended the launch window, Mr. Pollack wrote: “This may have convinced some [U.S.] officials that there was no imminent possibility of a test. It took the [National Security Council] press spokesman more than four hours to release a brief, formulaic statement criticizing the test. If Pyongyang was intent on deceiving the outside world about its plans, it succeeded brilliantly.”
David Wright, co-director of the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said: “It would not surprise me at all if North Korea was playing this game of knowing they were being watched and sending confusing signals to people watching them.”
Mr. Wright speculated that the North Koreans launched early to make it harder for U.S. and its regional allies to collect information about it. In addition, if the launch failed — as did a similar attempt in April — those countries would have less information about what went wrong, he added.
Mr. McDowell said: “If I were the North Koreans, I would be really happy even if the satellite totally dies. The fact that it’s in orbit is a huge achievement.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Nobody likes to talk about dying. But we can help.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow