Almost half the nation’s states are refusing to set up health care exchanges — a major component of the federal Affordable Care Act — and instead will let the Obama administration run statewide health-insurance-buying programs.
With a key Friday deadline looming, 24 states and the District of Columbia, meanwhile, say they will run exchanges either by themselves or in partnership with the federal government. Two states remain undecided.
A Pennsylvania health official told a congressional panel Thursday the exchange program’s “myriad of mandates and onerous procedural requirements” would be an enormous burden for his state.
“As mandates often are, they impose a one-size-fits-all approach and actually make our processes less efficient, not more efficient,” Pennsylvania Secretary of Public Welfare Gary D. Alexander told the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Health Subcommittee.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett a day earlier said his state won’t set up its own exchange, saying “health care reform is too important to be achieved through haphazard planning.”
Open enrollment for the exchanges is set to begin in October, with coverage to start in January 2014 — a schedule many states say is unrealistic because they’re waiting on more information from the federal government on rules, procedures and costs.
“The number of remaining concerns and unanswered questions simply do not give us the confidence needed to accept responsibility for this project,” Louisiana Health and Hospitals Department Secretary Bruce D. Greenstein told the House panel.
Louisiana also has decided to let the federal government run its exchange program — a marketplace where individuals and small businesses can shop for the most affordable coverage and where many will get help from the government to pay their premiums.
Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter, a longtime critic of President Obama’s health care plan, said Tuesday that a state-built health exchange is the best option for Idaho, though he left the final decision up to the state legislature, which convenes in January.
“There will be a health insurance exchange in Idaho,” the Republican governor said in a statement. “Our options have come down to this: Do nothing and be at the federal government’s mercy in how that exchange is designed and run, or take a seat at the table and play the cards we’ve been dealt. I cannot willingly surrender a role for Idaho.”
Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval also vowed to create a state-run health insurance exchange.
“I have to look at Nevada,” he told The Associated Press this week. “I’m not going to compare myself to any other governor. I have to look at the consequences of this very complicated law.”
States have until Friday to notify federal authorities if they want to create and run their own insurance exchanges. They also can choose to set up an exchange under a state-federal partnership, with a decision on that option due Feb. 15. If any state is undecided after that, the federal government will run that state’s exchange.
The deadline for both decisions initially was last month, but the federal government offered an extension after some governors asked for more time.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Movie reviews, interviews, including the latest on DVR and Blu-Ray.
A mother of three and a passionate conservative, Shirley Husar changes the game.
A collection of communities writers columns on Benghazi
We welcome you to the intimate and personal thoughts on the news and events we, as editors, watch, read, and discuss with our writers every day.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc