- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Middle Eastern firm’s deal to manage U.S. cargo port raises security concerns
- Bob McDonnell’s defense: Lonely wife developed ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House Republicans unveil bill to speed deportations of border children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
White House makes concessions in latest ‘fiscal cliff’ offer
Question of the Day
President Obama has agreed to lower his demand for higher taxes on wealthy Americans to those making $400,000 and above as part of negotiations with House Speaker John A. Boehner to avoid the "fiscal cliff," sources familiar with the discussions told The Washington Times on Monday night.
In response to Republican arguments for cuts to entitlement spending, Mr. Obama has agreed to reduce future cost-of-living increases for recipients of Social Security.
The offer, which the source made clear was not the final White House position, would seek a higher tax rate for those with incomes more than $400,000, up from the levels of $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples — a position the president repeatedly tried to hammer home in his successful re-election campaign.
"We view this as a good offer that shows we have met the Republicans halfway on spending and halfway on revenues," the source said.
Under the proposal, increasing taxes on those making more than $400,000 would produce $1.2 trillion in revenue, but the White House would also try to provide protections from lower-income Social Security beneficiaries, including the extension of unemployment insurance that were set to expire at the end of the year.
The president also is asking for new infrastructure spending to help stimulate the economy and is pushing for inclusion of a large amount of disaster aide to help offset the cost of super storm Sandy.
Aides to Mr. Boehner took issue with the offer, arguing that the president's package does not include enough spending cuts.
"A proposal that includes $1.3 trillion in revenue for only $930 billion in spending cuts cannot be considered balanced," said Boehner spokesman Brendan Buck. "We hope to continue discussions with the president so we can reach an agreement that is truly balanced and begins to solve our spending problems."
While the offer is a significant concession from the White House, many rank-and-file Republicans are still worried about the fallout over increasing taxes. The jockeying to reach a deal before the year-end fiscal cliff deadline is an effort by both sides to avoid automatic tax increases and across-the-board spending cuts that economists say would wreak havoc with the still struggling recovery.
The new offer comes after President Obama and Mr. Boehner met Monday at the White House for just under an hour of discussions. Though it falls short of a deal, the new concessions signify a major effort to come to an agreement on a framework for a deal in the waning days before Congress's scheduled Christmas week recess, set to begin Monday.
In addition to the concessions on the tax increases for the highest earners, Mr. Obama's latest counter-offer dropped his earlier proposal to extend a payroll tax cut due to expire Dec. 31, and he provided more savings in government spending than an earlier offer.
Mr. Boehner in his latest offer to the White House had agreed to raise the the $16.4 trillion debt ceiling without a vote by Congress. After last summer's battle over increasing the cap and the threat of the Treasury defaulting on its debts, Mr. Obama wanted to include a debt-ceiling increase in any broader budget deal.
The president has not backed down from renewed opposition to raising the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67, even though last year he had signified a willingness to negotiate on that point. Since then, Democrats on Capitol Hill and the AARP have voice strong opposition to including such a provision.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Susan Crabtree is an award-winning investigative reporter with more than 15 years of reporting experience in Washington, D.C. Her reporting about bribery, corruption and conflict-of-interest issues on Capitol Hill has led to several FBI and ethics investigations, as well as consequences for members within their caucuses and at the ballot box. Susan can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP senators want IG probe of Sebelius' 'Obamacare' fundraising
- Teaming up with Christie, Obama says Jersey shore 'back in business'
- No Moore: Obama flubs name of Oklahoma city devastated by tornado, calls it 'Monroe'
- Obama to Okla. tornado victims: 'We have got your back'
- Aide involved in Benghazi talking points scrubbing promoted by Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- McCLAUGHRY: Finish off the "Islamic State" quickly and cheaply
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world