- ‘Tis the Season: London florist creates $4.6 million Christmas wreath
- No tailgating allowed at Super Bowl XLVIII
- Pentagon to transport African troops to Central African Republic
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend’s shopping jumps to his death
- Ukraine leader to talk with protesters; Washington urges caution
- Pope Francis: A nun saved my life
- Israeli P.M. Netanyahu backs out of Mandela funeral
- Elian Gonzalez makes first trip outside Cuba since custody battle
- U.S., British intelligence agents enter online sci-fi world to spy on gamers
- Sarah Palin to host the outdoors show ‘Amazing America’
Republicans urged to call Democrats’ bluff
Press on entitlements, Norquist says
Grover Norquist says Republicans will emerge victorious from the “fiscal cliff” fight if they put television cameras in the negotiating room and smoke out Democrats over their reluctance to cut entitlement programs — the biggest drivers of federal spending and the national debt.
In a meeting with editors and reporters of The Washington Times, Mr. Norquist, the head of Americans for Tax Reform and father of the group’s influential “no new taxes” pledges, said Republicans are at a tipping point after 20 years of building their anti-tax brand, and the most disastrous thing lawmakers in the GOP could do is put their “fingerprints” on a tax increase. It would be better for the party, he said, to get no deal than to sign on to tax hikes.
The influential conservative said that in order for Republicans to come out on top in their showdown with President Obama, every fiscal cliff meeting from here on out should be public.
That, he said, would stop the White House from “lying” to the public about how the president wants to handle the “cliff” — the expiration of the George W. Bush-era tax cuts and the $110 billion in automatic cuts to domestic and defense spending scheduled to kick in early next year, thanks to the bipartisan deal lawmakers carved out last summer to raise the nation’s borrowing limit.
“Everything has to be in front of cameras,” Mr. Norquist said, adding that it would be “much more difficult” for Republicans to come out on top if they continue to meet behind closed doors, because Democrats are saying one thing privately and another thing publicly. “They have been lying about their willingness to reform entitlements.”
He also said Republicans should demand that whatever agreement the two parties reach should be posted online for at least a week before Congress votes on it.
Democrats and Republicans appear to be worlds apart in negotiations over how to avoid the fiscal cliff. Republican leaders are balking at the White House demand that taxes increase on families making at least $250,000 a year.
Republicans also slammed the budget framework that the White House floated last week, saying Mr. Obama and congressional Democrats need to “get serious” about spending cuts.
Mr. Norquist said the drumbeat for more transparency is building on Capitol Hill. He pointed to the demand last week by Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, that the talks “be taken out of the shadows.”
“With public debate, people would learn facts that are now obscured,” Mr. Sessions said.
Mr. Norquist has become a central player in the debate on Capitol Hill, thanks in large part to a handful of Republican lawmakers who have signaled a willingness to walk away from the Norquist anti-tax pledge.
That break in party ranks has created an opening for Democratic lawmakers, who have encouraged their Republican colleagues to rethink the Norquist pledge.
Standing on the floor of the Senate last week, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, said Mr. Norquist is now “out on an island” on taxes and that more Republicans are warming to the idea of letting some of the tax cuts expire.
Mr. Norquist, though, brushed aside the notion that Republicans are poised to abandon the pledge and criticized the news media for ignoring the fact that the GOP lawmakers who are flirting with a tax increase also are demanding serious changes to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid that Democrats have been unwilling to accept.
“Nobody has actually voted for a tax increase,” he said. “Nobody has raised his hand to say, ‘I want to vote for a tax increase.’ They’ve all said, ‘I might under certain circumstances, if a pink unicorn was given to me, then I would do that.’”
Mr. Norquist was more critical of Republicans such as Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma, who has suggested backing a stopgap deal that would prevent taxes, at least temporarily, from increasing for families making less than $250,000 next year.
That tactic puts “marbles under Boehner’s feet” in the negotiations, Mr. Norquist said. He said Republicans should fight to extend the Bush-era tax cuts across the board — even if that means going off the fiscal cliff — in order to save the anti-tax brand they have developed over more than two decades.
Lower rates will drive more economic growth, Mr. Norquist said, and generate more federal revenue that could help pay down the soaring national debt.
The 56-year-old anti-tax crusader, who founded Americans for Tax Reform in 1985, has rejected assertions by critics and skeptics who argue that the November election results reflect a repudiation of his group and other fiscal hard-liners.
In recent days, Mr. Norquist has become a fixture on cable news shows, defending the tax pledge, the tea party movement and fiscal conservatism.
In an appearance Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” he predicted a huge midterm backlash fueled by the tea party if the solution or the failure to reach a deal on the fiscal cliff results in higher tax bills.
“Tea party 2 is going to dwarf tea party 1 if Obama pushes us off the cliff,” Mr. Norquist said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Sen. Rand Paul: 'I am seriously thinking about' running for president in 2016
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'economic freedom zones' for Detroit
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- New battlefront emerges in war between Republicans, tea party
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
Latest Blog Entries
- GOP lawmakers raise fresh Obamacare security concerns
- Dick Cheney: President Obama does not believe in American exceptionalism
- Sen. Ron Johnson: Obamacare failures bolster GOP's chances of winning Senate
- Edward Snowden voted The Guardian's person of the year
- Cochran seeks 7th term, sets up another tea party primary battle
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Satanists petition for statue at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- Tech companies call for an end to NSA online snooping
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- WOLF: The president's other Obamacare lies
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, 'cherry-picked' intelligence: report
- Ted Cruz sees legal landmines ahead for Obamacare
- Mike Shanahan says he'd like to return; RG3 might be benched
- HARRIS: Redskins left in limbo over $7 million question
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The world impacts us. What happens in our towns, cities, states, country and on this planet makes a difference to us.
Happiness is attainable. Morning to night. I love to teach, deal with folks that have an issue and really wish to tackle it and write.
Brazen, leading-edge, “call it like it is” columns and reporting from Ohio native, radio host and writer, Sara Marie Brenner.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow