- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
- U.S., China race to finish line on ‘invisibility cloak’
Obama seeks compromise on contraception furor
Question of the Day
Advisers to President Obama sent signals Tuesday that the administration is considering a compromise with Catholic-affiliated institutions following an uproar over the administration’s plans to force them to offer birth control with employees’ health-care coverage.
“We certainly don’t want to abridge anyone’s religious freedoms, so we’re going to look for a way to move forward that both provides women with the preventive care that they need and respects the prerogatives of religious institutions,” Mr. Axelrod said. “I’m less concerned about the messaging of this than to find a resolution that makes sense.”
And the pastor of a Florida megachurch who advises Mr. Obama on religious issues said he is talking with the administration about a compromise.
“There are conversations right now to arrange a meeting to talk with folks about how this policy can be nuanced,” Pastor Joel Hunter told The Washington Post. “This is so fixable, and we just want to get into the conversation.”
The administration has said it is willing to work with religious hospitals, universities and other institutions, but White House officials have been portraying those efforts in the context of giving organizations up to a year to comply with the new rule. The floating of a possible compromise Tuesday came as church leaders and religious groups intensified their criticism of the administration.
White House press secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday that the administration “will will work in this [transition] period to see if … the implementation of the policy can be done in a way that allays some of those concerns.” But he said Mr. Obama “is committed to making sure that all women have access to these important preventive services.”
The outcry has been led by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. In dioceses across the country, priests have read letters from the pulpit denouncing the administration’s plan, which they say would require faith leaders to violate their religious principles.
The new rule was issued Jan. 20 as part of the administration’s implementation of the 2010 federal health care law. It requires employer to cover contraception as well as the so-called “morning after pill” and sterilization measures such as vasectomies in insurance plans offered to employees. Churches are exempt, but church-affiliated employers such as hospitals and universities are not.
Pro-life groups are urging grassroots supporters to write to Congress to overturn the new requirement. As of Tuesday, more than 25,000 people had signed an online petition.
The issue has emerged in the presidential race also. Republican frontrunner Mitt Romney said Mr. Obama is trampling religious freedom; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said the president is waging a “war on religion.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Dave Boyer is a White House correspondent for The Washington Times. A native of Allentown, Pa., Boyer worked for the Philadelphia Inquirer from 2002 to 2011 and also has covered Congress for the Times. He is a graduate of Penn State University. Boyer can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Fake signer near Obama at Mandela ceremony once charged with murder, rape
- Obama backs mayors' call for more federal money, higher wage
- Obama and family holiday in Hawaii — again
- White House denies 'highly irresponsible' Iran spy story
- Senate's filibuster rule change opens floodgates for Obama nominees
Latest Blog Entries
- White House condemns execution of uncle of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un
- Obamas to observe moment of silence for Sandy Hook shooting victims
- Boehner formally invites Obama for State of the Union address
- White House downplays concerns over phony sign-language interpreter
- Joe Biden signs condolence book for Nelson Mandela at D.C. embassy
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson: Gays 'wont inherit the kingdom of God'
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Nobody likes to talk about dying. But we can help.
A libertarian look at breaking news and political trends by author Tom Mullen.
Does it take over 25 years in public service to really know what goes on in Washington?
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow