- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
- Law firm that cleared N.J. Gov. Christie in ‘Bridgegate’ gave 10K to RGA, which he heads
- PETA ‘hopping mad’ at Michelle Obama for using real eggs at Easter Egg Roll
- Sneaky Nebraska toddler traps self inside claw machine game
- Biden to lead $600 million work force training effort
- Atheists’ Easter taunt to Christians: ‘Jesus is a myth’
- Miley Cyrus hospitalized, cancels Kansas City show
Pentagon to move women closer to front lines
Keeps ban on women in combat
The Pentagon announced Thursday that it is keeping its longtime ban on women serving as infantry, armor and special operations warriors in ground combat units, but it will open 14,000 support positions for them in units closer to the front lines.
At an afternoon news conference, reporters immediately pressed officials to explain why Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta opted to continue the ban.
“The current standards that exist for infantry all men cannot meet those standards,” Ms. Penrod said. “If the majority of women cannot serve in that [mission occupational specialty], the service secretary may restrict that [specialty]. That is with the Army.”
Asked how the military knows women can’t meet the standards without letting them try, Ms. Penrod said: “That’s based on experience with the leadership and experience in combat, and I trust that the service leadership understands those standards.”
Panetta spokesman George Little made clear that the armed services will continue to evaluate women’s roles.
“I would like to stress that Secretary Panetta believes that this is the beginning, not the end, of a process,” Mr. Little said.
The change will reverse an existing rule that says women may not be placed with combat units below the brigade level whose principal mission is direct ground combat.
In reality, it will mean intelligence and other support personnel - jobs women hold today - may now serve with those infantry and armor units at the battalion level and below.
“I think this is a great step forward,” Ms. Penrod said. “Eliminating the [placement] provision will now expand career opportunities for women, provide a greater pool of qualified members from whom our commanders may draw, reduce the operational tempo by increasing the total number of personnel available for assignments, and provide commanders greater flexibility in meeting combat support mission requirements.”
Army Maj. Gen. Gary Patton, principal director of military personnel policy, said the change will “allow us the opportunity now to place women in specialties that they’ve already been assigned to, they’ve been working in, but not working at that level below the brigade.
“So it allows us to place women in those positions in the Marine Corps, the Navy and the Army. They’re generally junior officers, midgrade officers and midgrade noncommissioned officers,” he said.
Congress ordered the review two years ago, prompted by stories of heroism by women in Afghanistan and Iraq and the fact that there are no precise battle lines in a counterinsurgency war.
Female military police, for example, were involved in firefights and went on house-to-house raids along with their male colleagues.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Hillary Clinton all but erased from tragic story of the attack in Benghazi
- Indiana assured that Pakistani firm working to thwart bomb makers
- Doubts on military's sex assault stats as numbers far exceed those for the U.S.
- Political hunt for sex abusers puts military justice in peril, lawyers say
- Sailors leaving Navy over stress on social issues, Top Gun instructor says
TWT Video Picks
By returning to Christian roots, the nation can achieve greatness once again
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- EDITORIAL: Intolerance at Brandeis silences Muslim dissident Hirsi Ali
- Kirsten Dunst: Actress sparks feminist ire: 'You need a man to be a man'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.