- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Obama’s pressure on Iran raises fear of a military clash
Question of the Day
Foreign policy analysts say an escalation of President Obamas hard-line approach toward Iran is heightening anxiety over the prospect of a military clash, as the U.S. and Europe impose tougher sanctions on the Islamic regime to stop its suspected nuclear weapons program.
At a recent Atlantic Council forum in Washington, foreign policy experts said the U.S. is entering a new, more dangerous phase with Iran.
“There’s been two innovations to American policy in recent weeks, in that we’ve added a military dimension to our policy toward Iran and to efforts to ratchet up pressure on Iran, which didn’t exist before,” said Michael Eisenstadt, director of the Military and Security Studies Program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Tensions spiked this week after the European Union agreed on an embargo of Iranian oil and sanctions against Iran’s central bank similar to those levied by the United States. An American aircraft carrier, along with British and French warships, sailed through Iranian territorial waters into the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf, prompting two senior Iranian lawmakers to threaten to close the narrow passage through which nearly 35 percent of the world’s oil supplies are shipped.
“This is the most scared I have been about the potential for military action between the U.S. and Iran since I started following the country,” said Barbara Slavin, a member of the Atlantic Council’s Iran Task Force.
“America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal,” he said.
Bruce Riedel, a former CIA official now with the Brookings Institution, said a military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities would cripple its program for no more than two years, while provoking Iranian retaliation against U.S. allies in the Middle East, he said.
“We are, indeed, in a fraught and dangerous situation,” said Mr. Riedel. “There is saber rattling from Tehran to South Carolina. And if you’ve watched the debates so far this year, you’ve seen a lot of saber rattling,” he added, referring to the primary contest for the Republican presidential nomination.
He predicted the United States or Israel would be seen as the aggressor “in the eyes of many countries in the world,” if either attacks Iran.
“We will have initiated a military action, and we will have started a war,” Mr. Riedel said. “We have drifted so easily into war twice in the last decade. Let’s not make that mistake again.”
“I think this year, 2012, is likely the year of decision for Israel on this issue,” said Mr. Eisenstadt. “I think from their point of view, they look at this and say that time may no longer be working in their favor, and they may be reaching a point in which deferring military action means forgoing military action altogether.”
The Obama administration insists it is still pursuing a “dual-track” approach to Iran, by which Mr. Obama is willing to talk with Iranian leaders or apply stronger sanctions when needed. Early in his presidency, Mr. Obama had offered an “open hand” that Iranian leaders have rejected.
“Iran’s government, however, has shown time and again that it is not interested in serious negotiation, and so the U.S., along with its international partners, has employed increasingly stronger sanctions …,” said State Department spokesman Eddie Vasquez.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq