JOLIET, Ill. — The murder trial of former suburban Chicago police Sgt. Drew Peterson began Tuesday with dueling explanations of his third wife’s death, clashes over evidence and a teary witness’s description of finding her friend’s body.
Prosecutors gave jurors an account that could have come from a 1940s pulp novel, in which a man does whatever he must — including murder — to keep his ex-wife’s hands off his money.
On the other side, Mr. Peterson’s attorneys argued the former officer was a victim of something newer: a 24-hour news cycle and cable TV’s talking heads, which together created a media frenzy that did not subside until prosecutors had charged an innocent man.
Mr. Peterson is charged with first-degree murder in the 2004 death of his third wife, Kathleen Savio. He is suspected but not charged in the 2007 disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy Peterson.
The prosecution’s first witness was Mary Pontarelli, a neighbor who discovered Mrs. Savio’s body in a dry bathtub, her hair soaked with blood.
“I saw Kathleen in the tub, ran out, threw myself on the ground and started screaming,” she said, her voice cracking.
Mr. Peterson appeared relaxed but engaged Tuesday, jotting notes and occasionally looking back at the crowded spectators’ benches.
In a dry tone, Will County State’s Attorney James Glasgow told jurors that Mr. Peterson, 58, killed Mrs. Savio, 40, and made it look like an accident.
“Just weeks before her death, he told her he was going to kill her and she would not make it to a divorce settlement and would never get his pension,” Mr. Glasgow said during his half-hour remarks.
Mr. Peterson’s real-life drama inspired a TV movie and a national spotlight was put on the case, as many speculated whether Mr. Peterson used his law-enforcement expertise to get away with Mrs. Savio’s murder and make 23-year-old Stacy Peterson vanish.
In his opening, defense attorney Joel Brodsky told jurors repeatedly there was no evidence that Mrs. Savio’s death was anything but a tragic accident.
“You will hear nothing but myth, rumor, innuendo and hearsay,” Mr. Brodsky said about the prosecution’s case. “You have a man’s life in your hands … deal with facts.”
He also sought to knock down what will certainly be the prosecutors’ contention that the investigation into Mrs. Savio’s death was a shoddy one. Mr. Brodsky said Illinois State Police investigators were very experienced, and the reason they conducted the investigation was because the Bolingbrook Police Department wanted to make sure there were no questions, as Mr. Peterson was one of their high-ranking officers.
Mr. Brodksy even said state police “bagged” Mrs. Savio’s hand to preserve any evidence.
Mr. Brodsky said Mrs. Savio’s death was an accident because there was no sign of a struggle.View Entire Story
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
From raising children to identifying educational and service options for your children, Speaking of Family is where you can write...
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall