- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Pollsters expect health law to remain unpopular
Question of the Day
The Supreme Court approved of President Obama’s health law on Thursday, but voters have never been as sold.
In poll after poll, more voters disapproved of the law than supported it, and in recent months large majorities told pollsters they were hoping the Supreme Court would strike down the law, either partially or in its entirety.
Still, it’s not clear what effect Thursday’s ruling will have on the political landscape. While most of those who disapproved of the law came from the conservative standpoint and said the law went too far in extending government power, a significant chunk came from the political left and said it didn’t go far enough.
And pollsters said both sides are likely to remain entrenched in those opinions going forward — at least until more of the law kicks in.
“I have said all along you won’t know how people really come down on this law until provisions are actually implemented. Right now, I don’t think opinion is going to change that much — they either love it or they hate it,” said Mollyann Brodie, director of public opinion and survey research for the Kaiser Family Foundation, which has done some of the most thorough polling.
The law was written so that full mandates and benefits don’t kick in until 2014, when the health exchanges begin offering subsidized coverage. That’s left voters having to guess whether they’ll be affected by the law — and how.
Ms. Brodie said that’s left few people right now who feel they’ve been touched by the law — and even fewer who say they’ve been helped. Kaiser’s March 2012 survey found that 35 percent said they’d been affected already, though 21 percent of those said they’ve seen detrimental effects. That means only 14 percent of those said they’ve benefited from the law so far.
The White House said this week that the administration’s efforts to rehabilitate the law’s image ran up against “the millions and millions and millions of dollars that was spent in an effort to discredit the Affordable Care Act.”
“The differential there in money spent was, I think, eye-opening. But it reflects the challenge that we have faced,” said press secretary Jay Carney.
The administration has fought back with taxpayers’ money.
The Los Angeles Times reported earlier this month that the Department of Health and Human Services spent $46 million to promote the law, accounting for about 60 percent of all pro-health-care ad spending during Mr. Obama’s tenure.
Two years ago, HHS sent a mailing to 40 million Medicare beneficiaries telling them the benefits the Obama administration said they’d see under the new law. The Washington Post calculated that at a cost of 45 cents each, that added up to $18 million in taxpayers’ money.
Spending on the other side of the issue has swamped supporters of the law, however, and many voters still argue the law includes “death panels” and other planks that supporters say were exaggerations or inaccurate portrayals.
There is some precedent for a shift in perception. When then-President George W. Bush signed a law adding a prescription-drug benefit to Medicare, it was unpopular, as seniors feared it would be complex. But after it went into effect, many seniors decided they liked it, and opinion shifted.
Going forward, the more adept side at spinning Thursday’s result is likely to control public opinion, said John Zogby, pollster for The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Senators work late on 'take it or leave it' defense bill that ignores big issues
- Illegal immigrant girl smuggled into U.S. by federal agents: judge
- Deportations under Obama drop to 1 percent in fiscal 2013
- White House says it's open to 45 of panel's proposed 46 NSA changes
- Democrats cite pope in call for minimum wage hike, jobless benefits
Latest Blog Entries
By Michael P. Orsi
Edward Snowden should declare his patriotism in court
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Special ops vets slam military benefit cuts
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Southern Fried Politics from the Lens of a Persian-American Millennial
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow