While several members are pushing for legislation to protect dog owners, Mr. Frosh - who co-chairs the panel - said he thinks the court’s ruling was “well-reasoned” and that he doesn’t see a pressing need for the assembly to intervene.
He said that while Maryland law - referred to by many as the “one-bite law” - holds owners responsible starting with the dog’s second violent incident, most other states already hold owners liable starting with the dog’s first attack.
“We’ll take a look at it,” he said. “We’ll at least be more well-informed before we go into special session, if we do.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
David Hill joined The Washington Times in February 2011 as a Maryland political reporter. He can be reached at dhill@washingtontimes.com.
By Douglas Holtz-Eakin
The young drop coverage to avoid higher premiums
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.

First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.