- ‘Tis the Season: London florist creates $4.6 million Christmas wreath
- No tailgating allowed at Super Bowl XLVIII
- Pentagon to transport African troops to Central African Republic
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend’s shopping jumps to his death
- Ukraine leader to talk with protesters; Washington urges caution
- Pope Francis: A nun saved my life
- Israeli P.M. Netanyahu backs out of Mandela funeral
- Elian Gonzalez makes first trip outside Cuba since custody battle
- U.S., British intelligence agents enter online sci-fi world to spy on gamers
- Sarah Palin to host the outdoors show ‘Amazing America’
No new coal plants under draft EPA rules
The Environmental Protection Agency Tuesday proposed greenhouse-gas regulations that effectively would prohibit the construction of new coal-fired power plants.
The rules, released in draft form and expected to be finalized later this year, would require new coal facilities to use expensive carbon-capture technology, which is still being developed and is not yet financially viable.
The EPA is not limiting emissions from existing coal plants, which provide about 45 percent of the nation’s electricity, or those expected to break ground within the next 12 months.
Despite those exemptions, some energy analysts are warning that the agency’s actions could result in higher electricity rates in coming years. Many in the industry also see the proposal as another example of what they say is the Obama administration’s unrelenting war on fossil fuels, contrary to the president’s frequent claims to have an “all-of-the-above” energy strategy.
“President Obama promised to bankrupt coal-powered electricity in the United States, and this latest rule … makes good on that promise,” said Thomas J. Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research. “If the EPA’s new rules are finalized, entire industries across the United States will be pushed out of business, and jobs with them. [The rule] satisfies the ideological demands of environmental extremists who want to destroy traditional energy in America.”
In addition to its proposed limits on coal, the agency also is mulling sweeping new regulations on the natural-gas industry. Next month, the EPA will release proposed guidelines for air emissions from drilling sites and later this year will unveil a widely anticipated report on purported links between hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and water contamination.
The environmental movement, a key constituency in Mr. Obama’s re-election effort, has enthusiastically backed all of those new rules and has pushed for even harsher crackdowns. Its proponents view Tuesday’s announcement as a small, yet significant, step in the right direction.
“These first-ever carbon pollution standards for new power plants mean that business as usual for the nation’s biggest sources of carbon pollution, dirty coal-burning utilities, is over,” said Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club.
Republicans in Congress see it much differently and wasted little time Tuesday in blasting the rules and painting them as a backdoor way for the administration to achieve environmentalists’ aims without democratic decision-making.
It first tried to tackle fossil-fuel emissions with the “cap-and-trade” legislation, which stalled in Congress. Some conservative and coal- and oil-state Democrats, along with virtually all Republicans, opposed the measure. Unable to muscle cap-and-trade through Congress, the EPA has simply bypassed lawmakers, said Rep. Fred Upton, Michigan Republican and chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
“EPA continues to overstep its authority and ram through a series of overreaching regulations in its attack on America’s power sector,” Mr. Upton said in a statement. “President Obama likes to say he is for ‘all of the above’ American energy, but his policies prove otherwise.”
The EPA requirements would force coal-fired plants to meet the standard of “1,000 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour,” a threshold that could be met only with unavailable carbon-capture technology. But the agency said its rules actually will change little because coal-powered plants already are on their way out.
“Because of the economics of the energy sector, the EPA and others project [natural gas] will be the predominant choice for new fossil-fuel-fired generation even absent this rule,” reads a portion of the proposed regulation.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Obama tries to calm Israeli fears over Iranian nuke deal 'not based on trust'
- Obama, first lady will attend Mandela memorial services
- Obama: Nelson Mandela now 'belongs to the ages'
- Obama lived with Uncle Onyango Obama in the 1980s, White House admits
- Obama calls on bartenders to help sell health care reform
Latest Blog Entries
By Tom Fitton
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- MILLER: Brady Campaign says Colorado recalls due to NRA, not grassroots opposition to gun control
- WOLF: The president's other Obamacare lies
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- Ted Cruz sees legal landmines ahead for Obamacare
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, 'cherry-picked' intelligence: report
- MSNBC host: Obamacare a 'wealthy white men' racist word
- Satanists petition for statue at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Richard Ivory, editor-in-chief of Hip Hop Republicans and HHR at Communities Digital News, turns his interests, and pen, to the people making news today.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
The world impacts us. What happens in our towns, cities, states, country and on this planet makes a difference to us.
Happiness is attainable. Morning to night. I love to teach, deal with folks that have an issue and really wish to tackle it and write.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow