LETTER TO THE EDITOR: More taxes won’t cut spending

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

We have a spending problem, not one of inadequate taxation. It’s good strategy for the profligate claiming to seek the moral high ground to demand tax increases as a “balance” for any deal to reduce spending.

This strategy wins them acolytes to whom the word “balance” has blind appeal. Counting on the vociferous opposition to any deal that includes higher taxes, the strategy reduces pressure on them to propose spending cuts that might become the first step to a real deal on reduction of government expenditures without any tax increase.

The reality is that new taxes do not reduce excess spending; they simply validate it. Once in place, taxes provide a cover for spending that should be cut. This explains the modus operandi of those insisting upon immediate and permanent tax increases in exchange for mere promises to cut spending.



© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts