- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Pot smokers’ outlook still hazy after Colorado legalization vote
Recreational users waiting for additional OK from feds
DENVER — When it comes to legalized pot, Coloradans are still holding their breath.
Three weeks after votes were cast, state recreational smokers are waiting and watching warily for the Obama administration’s reaction to Amendment 64, which made the Centennial State one of just two in the nation where lighting up in small amounts for personal pleasure is no longer a state crime.
With the issue of federal and state treatment of marijuana use stuck in a legal limbo, even some of the same Colorado lawmakers who opposed Amendment 64 are now calling on federal authorities to respect the will of the voters on recreational marijuana use. The initiative, which permits adults 21 and older to possess one ounce or less, passed by a margin of 55 percent to 45 percent in the Nov. 6 election. Voters in Washington state approved a similar measure the same day.
Colorado’s Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, and Attorney General John W. Suthers, a Republican, both fought Amendment 64, but now they are working to implement the measure. Both have contacted the U.S. Justice Department for guidance on how to proceed with enacting a voter-approved law that legalizes a Schedule 1 drug under the Controlled Substances Act.
“We need to know whether we can expect any different posture regarding marijuana grown and distributed for recreational use,” says the Nov. 14 letter signed by Mr. Hickenlooper and Mr. Suthers. “Specifically, we need to know whether the federal government will take legal action to block implementation or whether it will seek to prosecute grow and retail operations.”
In the wake of the Colorado and Washington state votes, the Justice Department made clear that its resolve to enforce federal drug laws “remain unchanged.” The federal Controlled Substances Act lists marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug, meaning it has a high potential for abuse and has no accepted medical use. Other Schedule 1 drugs include heroin, LSD and Ecstasy.
Rep. Diana DeGette, Colorado Democrat, introduced a bill last week that carves out an exception to federal law for states that approve adult marijuana use. The bill’s co-sponsors include Rep. Mike Coffman, Colorado Republican, another of those who opposed Amendment 64.
“I voted against Amendment 64 and I strongly oppose the legalization of marijuana,” Mr. Coffman said in a statement, “but I also have an obligation to respect the will of the voters given the passage of this initiative, and so I feel obligated to support this legislation.”
Mason Tvert, the longtime Colorado marijuana advocate who served as campaign director for the “Yes on 64” campaign, said he was heartened by the response of the state’s lawmakers.
“It’s wonderful to see our elected officials at every level of government working together to get this implemented,” Mr. Tvert said.
Local law enforcement also has jumped on the postvote bandwagon, with a half-dozen officials announcing that they will no longer pursue cases involving adult possession of small amounts of marijuana.
Boulder County District Attorney Stan Garnett said he will dismiss about 50 pending cases, while Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner plans to stop issuing tickets and making arrests in cases involving adults 21 and older. The impact is expected to be minimal, given that marijuana abuse was a low priority already.
A forum of marijuana activists this week found some sharp divisions between those urging a go-slow policy as the state officials consider regulations and those who say pot smokers should build on the momentum of the vote.
“We cannot give up what we won,” said attorney Christian Sederberg, one of the legalization campaign’s chief organizers, according to an account in The Denver Post. “We cannot kowtow and lose what we got because we’re afraid of federal intervention.”
One locale that isn’t changing its approach to marijuana possession just yet is Weld County. District Attorney Ken Buck, a spokesman for the anti-64 campaign, said his office “has an obligation to prosecute offenses that were crimes at the time they occurred.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Critics rail against liberal bias for commencement speakers
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Defiant Reid vows Bundy ranch confrontation 'not over'
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Former Blue Angels commander relieved of duty for alleged misconduct
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.