- George Zimmerman will not be charged in domestic dispute
- Russian officials press bilateral U.S. trade deal
- Selfies at Funerals blog creator retires after Obama flub: ‘Our work here is done’
- New Obama adviser Podesta is against Keystone but will steer clear of pipeline deliberations
- 40 Australian adults, children found in ‘one of the worst accounts of incest ever made public’
- Venezuela’s Maduro calls on student ‘price vigilantes’ to hit the streets, report businesses
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Bow before Valkyrie, NASA’s ‘superhero robot’ entry in DARPA challenge
- 10-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for pretend bow-and-arrow shooting
- Tea partyers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
MILLER: What Biden didn’t say
Rude performance says volumes about lack of policy vision
Question of the Day
Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s bizarre behavior in Thursday night's debate was no accident. The exaggerated expressions and overheated theatrics were meant to distract the public from arriving at the obvious conclusion: This administration has no viable solutions to America's problems.
ABC's Martha Raddatz, moderating the debate, asked Mr. Biden what he would do about the $16.2 trillion debt besides raising taxes on the wealthy. The former Delaware senator had no direct response. Instead, he launched an attack on Mitt Romney's plan to provide tax relief for everyone.
Mr. Ryan, the House Budget Committee chairman, summarized the problem aptly: "We asked the Congressional Budget Office, 'Tell us what President Obama's plan is to prevent a debt crisis.' They said, 'It's a speech. We can't estimate speeches.' "
The biggest driver of our debt is Medicare, so any solution to the debt crisis necessarily involves taking on entitlement reform. The Ryan-Romney ticket proposes to allow those under 55 years old to choose their own health care at retirement (with standard Medicare as one of the options). Their detailed proposal would reduce benefit increases for the wealthy and slowly raise the eligibility age to rein in costs.
The current administration, on the other hand, further weakened Medicare by pilfering $716 billion from its trust fund to pay for Obamacare. Instead of proposing an alternative, the vice president spent two uninterrupted minutes denying the facts. When Mr. Ryan tried to speak on the topic, Mr. Biden interrupted him 18 times.
This wasn't strong ground for Mr. Biden, so he went after Mr. Romney for supporting President George W. Bush's efforts to give younger workers the option to choose a private retirement account. Mr. Ryan calmly explained that was not Mr. Romney's plan, but if nothing was done, seniors will necessarily see a 25 percent across-the-board cut in benefits in the middle of their retirement.
The Wisconsin Republican added that their platform will not affect anyone at or near retirement, but they will have the common-sense reforms of means testing and gradually raising the eligibility age. Mr. Biden just laughed. Appropriately so, since in four years, the only thing Mr. Obama has done about Social Security is raid it to underwrite his temporary payroll tax cut to voters in advance of what he hopes will be his re-election.
When asked about taxes, Mr. Biden actually had something to say -- it just wasn't true. "The middle class will pay less, and people making a million dollars or more will begin to contribute slightly more," he proclaimed. This sounds a lot more appealing than Mr. Obama's actual policy of tax hikes on anyone making over $200,000.
As Mr. Ryan calmly explained, "It doesn't even pay for 10 percent of their proposed deficit spending increases." The Romney-Ryan tax plan is based on growing the economy by making the tax code fairer and lowering everyone's rates, including those paid by businesses. The change would encourage 7 million new jobs.
The takeaway for voters who watched the only vice presidential debate is that, in between smirking, guffawing, interrupting, sighing and eye rolling, Mr. Biden tacitly admitted his side has no plan to revive America's economy.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Dick Heller challenges D.C.’s gun registration, files for summary judgment in Heller II
- MILLER: Brady Campaign says Colorado recalls due to NRA, not grassroots opposition to gun control
- MILLER: Obamacare enrollees include 101 members of the House of Representatives
- MILLER: Obamacare disaster gets three-week PR blitz by White House
- MILLER: Black Friday gun sales sixth-highest in history but lower than 2012
Latest Blog Entries
An unlikely conservative hero could emerge from the budget cave
Get Breaking Alerts
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- MILLER: Dick Heller challenges D.C.s gun registration, files for summary judgment in Heller II
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whisky: U.K.-born expert
- Tea partyers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Leon Panetta named as source of 'Zero Dark Thirty' scriptwriters information