The Washington Times

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Big Bird or Big Navy?

During the last presidential debate in Boca Raton, Fla., President Obama attempted to ridicule and diminish Mitt Romney (“Obama, horses and bayonets,” Comment & Analysis, Wednesday). The president’s snide remarks comparing the use of modern naval vessels with horses and bayonets was right out of the playbook of the late radical Saul Alinsky.

It should be remembered that Alinsky was a prominent communist and a hero of our current president. With regard to the size of the Navy, if we were not spread so thin, perhaps one of our smaller ships with a Marine contingent on board and armed with bayonets could have rescued our brave Americans in Benghazi. We know the president loves the ships that airplanes land on, and the ones that go underwater, but in this age of terrorism, we will require a large variety of naval assets in robust numbers.

On Nov. 6 we will have a chance to decide which is more important: Big Bird or Big Navy.

GEORGE SCHONHOLTZ

Boca Raton, Fla.

© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • The Washington Times

    WOLF: Tyranny in our time

  • Illustration: Homegrown jihad by Greg Groesch for The Washington Times

    EDITORIAL: Homegrown jihad

  • President Obama speaks at Ellicott Dredges in Baltimore on May 17, 2013, during his second "Middle Class Jobs and Opportunity Tour." (Associated Press)

    EDITORIAL: The Obama enemies list

  • Get Breaking Alerts