- Obama: Hole U.S. ‘digging out of’ requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
Rivals let barbs fly during Ohio Senate debate
GOP challenger Mandel rips Sen. Brown
Question of the Day
CINCINNATI — With the race tightening less than two weeks before Election Day, the candidates for U.S. Senate in the swing state of Ohio squared off Thursday night in their final debate.
The back and forth between incumbent Sen. Sherrod Brown, a Democrat, and his Republican challenger, Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel, turned contentious from the outset — with each accusing the other of bending the truth, twisting the other’s words and being a rubber stamp for his respective political party.
Mr. Brown, elected to the Senate in 2006, had held a sizeable, double-digit lead over Mr. Mandel, but the contest has tightened considerably. A Rasmussen poll released this week shows Mr. Brown up 48 percent to 44 percent. Other polls have the race even closer, most putting it within the margin of error.
The Ohio contest is central to Republicans’ plan to recapture control of the Senate, and Mr. Mandel wasted no time in painting the incumbent as a creature of Washington who can’t be trusted to help repair the nation’s lagging economy.
“In order to change Washington, we have to change the leaders we send there,” Mr. Mandel said.
Mr. Brown “talks about standing up for the middle class. The reality is, he’s stood on the middle class” by supporting policies that haven’t created jobs while allowing fuel and other costs to rise, he said.
Mr. Brown, as he’s done throughout the campaign, shot back that Mr. Mandel is a sellout to anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, and said the Republican would’ve allowed the auto industry to go bankrupt in 2008 and 2009. More than 800,000 jobs in the Buckeye State are tied to the auto industry.
“I just wonder what you would’ve done to help the middle class in this state,” Mr. Brown said.
The testy exchange wasn’t limited to the Cincinnati television studio that hosted the debate.
Outside the building, dozens of supporters of each candidate screamed at each other and chanted slogans. Some pulled down the other candidate’s yard signs, which had been put up in front of the studio.
The scene was indicative of a race that’s often turned ugly, and there’s been little love lost between the two candidates over the past several months.
That continued Thursday night as the incumbent criticized Mr. Mandel for not taking a firm stand on whether he supports the GOP budget plan put forward by the party’s vice-presidential nominee, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.
“When you go to Washington, you actually have to vote yes or no,” Mr. Brown said.
Mr. Mandel accused the Democrat of being a “bail-out senator” for supporting the bank and auto sector rescues. He also said Mr. Brown supports using American tax dollars “as welfare for foreign countries that harbor terrorists,” referring to U.S. aid to Pakistan and other nations in the Middle East.
The two sides found little common ground throughout the 60-minute debate, though they did agree that benefit levels for Social Security and Medicare must not be changed for those nearing retirement.
Mr. Brown took it a step further, saying that “on Social Security, you don’t raise the retirement age,” while Mr. Mandel said the age, which was set in the 1930s when life expectancies were much shorter, may have to be raised in order to preserve the program.
He also came out in favor of a position often seen as taboo within the Republican Party: trimming military spending.
“I don’t think we need all of these bases throughout Europe. We’re not fighting the Nazis anymore. We’re not fighting the Cold War anymore,” he said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Obama, first lady will attend Mandela memorial services
- Obama: Nelson Mandela now 'belongs to the ages'
- Obama lived with Uncle Onyango Obama in the 1980s, White House admits
- Obama calls on bartenders to help sell health care reform
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
Latest Blog Entries
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Red Alert focuses on the hottest political topics in the nation and calls Americans to action.
History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.
White House pets gone wild!