- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on ‘outdated’ agencies
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Pentagon plans to destroy Syrian chemical arms on ship at sea
- Paris Metro issues ‘politeness manual’ to improve passengers’ behavior
- Justin Bieber, crew detained at Australian airport in drug search
- Lee Rigby trial: Muslim who machete-hacked soldier calls it ‘humane’ kill
- GM ending Chevy sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
- Putin’s diplomats to U.S. busted for living high life off $1.5M bilked from Medicaid
- Happy Meal: Couple goes to McDonald’s, leaves with bag packed with cash
- Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
Immigration draft lays out contentious points plan to reward, select immigrants
The immigration reform bill that senators are writing in secret would move U.S. policy to a points-based system that would reward immigrants who are taking care of disabled parents at the same level as those who have earned master’s degrees in high-tech fields, according to a draft of the legislation reviewed by The Washington Times.
The eight senators writing the bill plan to announce provisions this week, ahead of a major hearing in the SenateJudiciary Committee on Wednesday, but some details already have been leaked. Among them is the points system to select immigrants.
Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican, said his plan would make illegal immigrants wait years to gain citizenship. Republican leaders are counting on Mr. Rubio to sell the plan to skeptical conservatives.
“This is not amnesty. Amnesty is the forgiveness of something,” Mr. Rubio said on “Fox News Sunday.” “We’re going to create an alternative that says, ‘OK, you want to stay here, you’ll have to wait more than 10 years, you’ll have to pay this fine, you’ll have to pay your registration fee, you’ll have to be gainfully employed, you won’t qualify for any federal benefits, and then after all of that you don’t get to apply for anything until the enforcement mechanisms are in place.’”
Mr. Rubio made the rounds of all of the major Sunday political talk shows to pitch the legislation. His appearances marked what one immigration rights advocate called “opening day” for what is expected to be a bruising fight on Capitol Hill.
“The preseason is over. Opening day is upon us,” said Frank Sharry, executive director of America’s Voice. “Establishing a new road map to citizenship for undocumented immigrants is the core of the reform bill to be unveiled this week. If bipartisanship and common sense continue to hold, we will achieve a major breakthrough this year.”
Mr. Rubio is negotiating with seven other lawmakers: Republican Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Jeff Flake, and Democratic Sens. Richard J. Durbin, Charles E. Schumer, Robert Menendez and Michael Bennet.
The crux of their deal is that illegal immigrants would be granted immediate legal status, but most of them would have to wait years before gaining permanent legal residency, a key step on the pathway to citizenship.
The government would have to take steps to boost border security and interior enforcement.
Critics question whether the government would follow through on the enforcement measures, and some Republicans have said they expect a high cost to taxpayers — particularly if current illegal immigrants gain access to entitlement programs.
Mr. Rubio and other sponsors say they don’t intend for newly legalized immigrants to have access to public benefits, but three Republicans charge that the government already does a poor job of weeding out people using those services.
“Moreover, even if the bill does contain strong, loophole-free language to this effect, it will only succeed in delaying — not reducing — the cost to taxpayers,” Sens. Jeff Sessions, Chuck Grassley and Pat Roberts said in a letter to the eight senators writing the bill.
“Once the present illegal population receives green cards, they will be eligible under current law for a wide array of federal welfare programs including food stamps, Supplemental Security Income, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and Medicaid,” the three senators wrote. “By their very nature, these programs necessarily represent a net fiscal cost to taxpayers.”
But Mr. Rubio said the immigrants’ contributions to the American economy must be weighed in order to get a true sense of costs and benefits.
“You will find that when we reform our legal immigration system, we get these people that are already here now paying their taxes and not taking anything out of the system, this will be a net positive for the country economically now and in the future,” he said.
Some Republicans have a problem with giving illegal immigrants a pathway to citizenship, but Mr. Rubio and his allies say the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. right now cannot be sent home en masse and essentially are living in the country under an amnesty because their chances of deportation are slim.
According to the draft of the bill reviewed by The Times, which was dated earlier this month, the agreement could boost legal immigration dramatically.
Polling suggests that would be controversial. Most Americans tell pollsters that they want the flow of immigration to remain the same or be curbed, while less than 20 percent say it should be increased.
The draft legislation would create a pathway to citizenship for many of those who remain in the country for at least a decade under special programs such as Temporary Protected Status. Under current law, those programs are not supposed to be pathways to permanent residency.
Under the system described in the draft, future immigrants would be awarded for educational attainment, work experience in the U.S., language skills and ties to those already in the country. It is similar to systems used by other major economies, including Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada.
Under the proposed U.S. system, those with doctoral degrees would earn 50 points toward immigration, while those who have attained only high school education would earn 15 points. Owning a home would be worth 40 points, while being proficient in English would be worth 20 points. Having critical foreign language skills, as determined by the State Department, would be worth 10 points.
Those with their own health insurance would be awarded 10 points and would earn an extra 10 points for every family member for whom they also had coverage.
The draft gives the Homeland Security Department the ability to create categories of points and to adjust the existing point system — a striking grant of power to an agency that is under fire from Congress for its interpretations of immigration law.
The 2007 immigration bill that was defeated in the Senate also included a points system. That system drew criticism from some on the left, who said it put too much value on work and education and not enough value on family ties.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Bipartisan House votes to stop patent 'trolls'
- Medal of Honor case goes to 3rd defense secretary; Rep. Duncan Hunter says system broken
- John Boehner says blame for slow Congress lies with Democrats
- Hola: Boehner prepares to push amnesty bill through House
- Adios muchacho: Christie threatens veto of NJ's Dream Act
Latest Blog Entries
David Eldridge joined The Washington Times in 1999 and over the next seven years helped lead the paper’s coverage of regional politics and government, Sept. 11, and the sniper attacks of 2002. In 2006, he was named managing editor of the paper’s Web site. He came to The Times from the Telegraph in North Platte, Neb., where he served as ...
- Sens. Klobuchar, Collins predict a deal by Thursday
- Rand Paul: GOP can't accept Democrats' attempts to undo sequesters
- Lew says health exchange rollout glitches typical for new software
- John Boehner, Ted Cruz: Upcoming debt-ceiling vote will have conditions
- Treasury Secretary Jack Lew: Obama can't stop default if debt ceiling is hit
Latest Blog Entries
- Mainers would rather move to Canada than down South
- McCain: 'Stand your ground' laws may need review
- Sen. Tom Coburn: Holder investigating himself is a 'total conflict of interest'
- CNN poll: IRS, AP and Benghazi haven't dinged Obama's approval rating
- Slain diplomat's mom on Obama's Benghazi comments: 'Bullfeathers'
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- CARSON: Getting to the top by starting at the bottom
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- Nelson Mandela, South Africa's first black president, dies at age 95
- Allen West warns Obamas backdoor gun control is moving forward
- Obama lived with Uncle Onyango Obama in the 1980s, White House admits
- Russian diplomats busted bilking $1.5 million from Medicaid
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- U.S. drops 2,000 mice on Guam by parachute to kill snakes
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
NFL junkie Eric Golub reports on his favorite obsession. There is no football offseason. Every February he pretends to care about other sports while sobbing uncontrollably each Sunday until September.
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Brazen, leading-edge, “call it like it is” columns and reporting from Ohio native, radio host and writer, Sara Marie Brenner.
White House pets gone wild!