- Man arrested in car bomb plot at Kansas airport
- Prison inmates take up ‘Knockout’ game, target female officers
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- John Kerry: Israel-Palestinian peace deal paved for April
- India diplomat who touts women’s rights busted for $3 wage to nanny
- MSNBC host Ed Schultz paid $252K by unions in 2012-2013
- Korean War memorial ordered to take down Christian cross
- Billy Graham near death, ‘close to going home to be with the Lord’
- SeaTac, Wash.: City’s new $15 minimum wage heads to court
- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
Boston bombing drama hits immigration debate
The uncle of the two suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing said Friday that they were born in Kyrgyzstan and came to the U.S. in 2003 on claims of asylum — news that’s already beginning to reverberate in the immigration debate just beginning on Capitol Hill.
Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican, said lawmakers should hit the brake on any immigration bill until the full details can be learned about the bombings.
“I can’t imagine the Senate moving quickly on this and trying to pass a bill out of the Senate before we get to the bottom of the Boston Marathon bombers. The American people just won’t stand for that,” Mr. King told The Washington Times.
Ruslan Tsarni, the Montgomery Village, Md., man who said he is the two suspects’ uncle, told reporters Friday morning that they were born in the Central Asian nation of Kyrgyzstan. He said the only motives he could think of for the nephews’ action was that they were “losers” who had trouble assimilating into American life since arriving a decade ago.
The older brother was killed in a firefight with police overnight, while the younger brother is on the loose, and officials have ordered much of the Boston area to be on lockdown.
Government records indicate there were 44 applications for asylum from Kyrgyzstan nationals in 2003, and 15 cases approved, totaling 22 persons.
Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a New York Democrat who helped write a massive new immigration overhaul bill introduced this week, urged his colleagues not to “conflate” the Boston attack with their efforts to legalize illegal immigrants.
Presaging the news about the two suspects’ status, he told fellow senators that the U.S. asylum and refugee programs have been “significantly strengthened” in the last five years.
“We are much more careful about screening people and determining who should and should not be coming into the country,” he said. “And if there are any changes that our homeland security experts tell us need to be made, I’m committed to making them as chairman of the immigration subcommittee.”
But his plea to separate the bombing from immigration is unlikely to be heeded.
Minutes before he spoke at a hearing called to examine his immigration bill, Sen. Charles E. Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, said the bombings will force the country to see what changes need to be made.
“Given the events of this week, it’s important for us to understand the gaps and loopholes in our immigration system,” the Iowa Republican said. “While we don’t yet know the immigration status of people who have terrorized the communities in Massachusetts, when we find out, it will help shed light on the weaknesses of our system.”
The immigration bill Mr. Schumer and seven other colleagues have written would legalize immigrants and expand avenues for overall legal immigration — though it would eliminate the diversity visa lottery and cut the ties used to bring in siblings of immigrants.
Mr. Schumer said that will actually enhance safety, since it will mean police no longer have to worry about illegal immigrants who do not have serious criminal records but who remain in the shadows.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- Wind farms: Interior Department sacrifices eagle protection for alternative energy
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Bipartisan House votes against 'patent trolls' who file lawsuits against innovators
- Bipartisan House votes to stop patent 'trolls'
Latest Blog Entries
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- U.S. Navy-China showdown: Chinese try to halt U.S. cruiser in international waters
- 'Active shooter' injures two at Colo. school; gunman on the loose
- Obama birther theories float as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- Billy Graham near death, close to going home to be with the Lord
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- North Korea's official report on Jang Song Thaek
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Musings of a bilingual, agnostic, combat veteran and jewelry maker.
Topics will include politics, religion, race, culture, and anything else that needs to be discussed...
Our Choice: Individual responsibility and self-government or the abandonment of the American Revolution
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow