- Mystery sign poster hits Washington state town: ‘It’s OK to say Merry Christmas’
- Pope Francis forms commission to advise on sex abuse
- Anthony Weiner on radio? Cumulus says, ‘Never, ever’
- Executive order: Obama ups green-energy mandate on feds to 20 percent
- GOP launches candidate training: How to talk to women
- N.Y.’s Rockefeller Center lights up, as Bloomberg flicks on 76-foot Christmas tree
- Northern Ireland turns to ‘Game of Thrones’ to draw in tourists
- Washington woman live-tweets husband’s horrific car death
- China City of America mulled for New York — with $65M tax dollars
- Yemen defense ministry rocked by suicide bomber, gunfire
Senators file amended immigration bill to keep E-Verify running
Moving to quell concerns, the newest version of the Senate’s immigration bill keeps the E-Verify electronic check system in place so that states that already require its use can continue to do so, even while the rest of the country is getting up to speed.
Backers have been facing a barrage of criticism from senators and interest groups that want to see a crackdown on illegal immigration, and had vowed to make any reasonable changes they could.
The E-Verify language is one of those.
The bill says that the Homeland Security secretary “shall continue to operate the E-Verify Program … as in effect the minute before the date of the enactment of this Act, until the transition” to the new employment verification system the bill calls for.
A handful of states already require all businesses to use E-Verify, and some critics had said the bill repealed the system immediately but didn’t replace it for several years, leaving a gap that unscrupulous businesses could exploit.
Backers said they didn’t change any major policies, but wanted to clear up what they said were misconceptions about their intentions.
The new version tweaks many of the fees and fines in the bill, and also specifically directs that money collected from those will be used first to repay the federal treasury for the $7.5 billion that will be spent on border security enhancements.
Lawmakers also tightened up prohibitions on drunk drivers, so that those convicted of three drunk-driving charges are deemed inadmissible regardless of when the charges happened. Under the previous version, immigrants had their slate wiped clean once the bill passed and had to accrue three new drunk-driving convictions to be deemed inadmissible.
In order to be deported, though, one of the three offenses must happen after the law takes effec
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Medal of Honor case goes to 3rd defense secretary; Rep. Duncan Hunter says system broken
- John Boehner says blame for slow Congress lies with Democrats
- Hola: Boehner prepares to push amnesty bill through House
- Adios muchacho: Christie threatens veto of NJ's Dream Act
- Issa: FBI impeding inquiry into IRS targeting of conservative groups
Latest Blog Entries
- CURL: 'Mission Accomplished' for Obamacare
- American teacher shot and killed at Benghazi international school
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- NAPOLITANO: Liberty, the wellspring of capitalism and charity
- Pentagon may give recruits 'a shot to start over' after shameful social media posts
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
- Young millennials shun Obamacare, creating risky imbalance
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- HARPER: 'Knockout game' not a myth to liberal Sharpton
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
A libertarian look at breaking news and political trends by author Tom Mullen.
A stat-head’s outlook, direct from his worn in couch cushion.