- House and Senate negotiators reach two-year budget deal
- Congress seeks ban on in-flight calls
- Michelle Malkin’s Twitchy site sold to owners of Townhall, HotAir: report
- GM’s Barra to be first woman to run top American carmaker
- China: Poisonous smog is a military asset, if you think about it
- Texas woman admits to sending ricin to Obama
- Ron Paul on son Rand: ‘I think he probably will’ run for president
- Cold War heats up again in the Arctic: Russian airfield reactivated after 20 years
- 6-year-old boy suspended for sexual harassment over kiss
- Voters deciding Mass. congressional contest
Nonprofits take contraception issue to court
Object to health care mandate
Religious nonprofits have begun to respond in court to the plan the Obama administration offered this month to shelter them from a mandate requiring certain employers to insure contraception — and it's probably not what the White House wanted to hear.
East Texas Baptist University and Houston Baptist University filed court papers that make it clear their dispute with the Department of Health and Human Services is not over, even after the agency proposed an accommodation on Feb. 1. That proposal would require insurers to set up separate policies to handle birth control, morning-after pills and other forms of contraception covered by the requirement in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
The universities said little would change under the proposal, since the administration did not extend the religious exemption that, as it stands, applies only to houses of worship.
"The same drugs would be provided by the same insurer to the same employees, all as an automatic result of plaintiffs' offering health insurance," the Baptist nonprofits said in a status report filed Friday with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
When HHS officials unveiled their accommodation, they stressed it was merely a proposal that is open for comment. But the nation's Catholic bishops flatly rejected the plan, and legal advocacy groups that are handling lawsuits against the Obama administration show no signs of standing down.
The lawsuits — mostly from universities with religious affiliations — were placed on hold while the Obama administration devised a compromise for religious nonprofits. While attorneys for Baptist universities in Texas were quick to update the courts with their reaction to Mr. Obama's olive branch, other plaintiffs have yet to reignite their legal disputes through legal briefs, motions or status reports. The Obama administration's rule must be finalized by Aug. 1.
"We haven't had to file anything new, because nothing has really changed," said Matt Bowman, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing several religious nonprofits and religiously devout corporate owners who have sued over the mandate.
He said the lawsuits will continue and likely pick up by August if the exemption is not broadened to cover all religious employers.
Victor Nakas, a spokesman for Catholic University in Washington, said Tuesday the university is "still evaluating all our options and [we] are not yet prepared to announce our next steps with regards to the HHS mandate."
"The administration could have made this very simple by simply exempting all objecting organizations from the mandate, out of respect for their consciences," said S. Kyle Duncan, general counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty that is handling the Texas lawsuits and other cases. "It didn't do that, however."
HHS has said the contraception mandate provides services that most women rely on, yet many in the 18 to 34 age bracket find hard to afford. As a legal argument, supporters of the mandate say employers are not entitled to push their religious beliefs onto their employees.
Attorneys for the federal government filed their own status report Monday -- in Texas and other federal courts -- to note the HHS proposal fulfills a December court order that delays the nonprofits' lawsuits while the Obama administration worked on its accommodation.
Under the proposal, religious nonprofits must self-certify that they object to the "Obamacare" mandate so their insurers can divorce contraception coverage from the nonprofits' regular health plans. Objecting institutions that self-insure would be assisted by a third-party administrator.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Harry Reid, David Vitter spar over Obamacare 'exemptions'
- Oregonians likely to rely on paper Obamacare enrollment into January
- Oregon fails to sign up single person on health care website as states struggle
- Ted Cruz sees legal landmines ahead for Obamacare
- Obama admin.: One in 10 Obamacare forms might have errors
Latest Blog Entries
- Calif.: Give 'gift of health' by pledging cash for the uninsured
- Tensions hit boiling point over Obamacare enrollment figures, error rates
- Young, uninsured adults vital to Obamacare are not keen on enrolling: New Harvard poll
- Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox will promote Obamacare at Mall of America
- HealthCare.gov employs a new look once again
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Harry Reid's visa pressure cooker
- Somber duty: U.S. presidents in hot demand at Mandela's memorial
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- Israeli P.M. Benjamin Netanyahu backs out of Nelson Mandela funeral
- Obama's antics at Nelson Mandela tribute: Jovial conversation, handshake with Raul Castro
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whiskey: U.K.-born expert
- FITTON: A closer look at the Benghazi lie
- Galaxy S4 owner claims Samsung tried to silence him after phone caught fire
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
A column dedicated to discussing politics, national security, civil liberties, and education.
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
The “Silver Tsunami” created by aging Baby Boomers is hitting America. Let’s explore how we adjust to it, enjoy it and defy negative expectations about age.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow