- Nancy Pelosi is adamant: Congress worked together when Bush was president
- ‘Slender Man’ stabbing victim receives Purple Heart from anonymous veteran
- Kentucky city called socialist for buying gas station, undercutting competitor fuel prices
- Israel hits five mosques, sports complex in overnight Gaza strikes
- Hillary Clinton dogged for refusing reporters’ questions on book tour
- EPA tweet baffles: ‘I’m now a C-List celebrity in Kim Kardashian: Hollywood’ iPhone game
- Australian P.M. Abbott: MH17 evidence tampered with on ‘industrial scale’
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez tells Hispanics to vote and ‘punish those’ who oppose amnesty
- Country singer Tim McGraw not sorry for slapping female fan: ‘Things happen’
- Iraq vet cited for owning 14 therapeutic pet ducks
Vote on Brennan for CIA post put off
On Benghazi attack, questions remain
Question of the Day
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has postponed a vote on the nomination of White House terrorism adviser John O. Brennan to be CIA director after seeing emails that showed his role in drafting controversial “talking points” about the deadly Sept. 11 terrorist attack on a U.S. diplomatic post in Libya last year.
Congressional officials told The Washington Times that committee Chairwoman Sen. Dianne Feinstein had planned to hold a vote as soon as Thursday.
But the California Democrat said this week that there would be no vote on the nomination before March 7.
“The situation is fluid,” said Mrs. Feinstein’s spokesman, Brian Weiss, adding that no date had been set for a vote.
White House officials told The Times on Wednesday that the emails provided to committee members, which will be shared this week with members of the House intelligence committee, show that Mr. Brennan played a minor role in drafting the talking points and none at all in making the changes that have so infuriated Republicans.
Many in the U.S. intelligence community were convinced within hours that the military-style assault on the diplomatic compound in Benghazi was probably the work of al Qaeda-linked terrorists. But the talking points — prepared three days after the event — did not call the attack an act of terrorism and removed a reference to the attackers’ al Qaeda link.
Officials have said the changes were made within the intelligence community to protect sources and methods because the evidence of the connection to al Qaeda came from highly classified electronic eavesdropping.
Republicans have contended that the al Qaeda link was deleted because it undermined President Obama’s election campaign message that the terrorist network was decimated.
Several Republican senators have said they would block Mr. Brennan’s confirmation if they were not allowed to see documents showing exactly how changes were made to the talking points. Two of the most vocal critics, Sen. John McCain of Arizona and Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, are not members of the intelligence committee.
It could not be learned Wednesday afternoon whether arrangements would be made for nonmembers of the committee to view the documents.
The administration hopes that making the documents available will clear a path for Mr. Brennan to be confirmed.
“The confirmation process should be about the nominees and their ability to do the jobs they’re nominated for,” said Ms. Hayden, the White House spokeswoman.
“As the confirmation hearings clearly showed, John Brennan is extraordinarily qualified to head the CIA, and the president needs him in place now. We face enormous national security and intelligence challenges across the globe, and to hold up these nominees for unrelated reasons is not in our national security interests.”
Other committee members are concerned about the administration’s legal justification for the targeted killing of suspected terrorists, including Americans.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Shaun Waterman is an award-winning reporter for The Washington Times, covering foreign affairs, defense and cybersecurity. He was a senior editor and correspondent for United Press International for nearly a decade, and has covered the Department of Homeland Security since 2003. His reporting on the Sept. 11 Commission and the tortuous process by which some of its recommendations finally became ...
- Senator's memo shows Iran links in Homeland Security's troubled immigration program
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- Dems back bill to fix problems in investor visa program
- Democrats proceed with Mayorkas vote despite pending investigation
- NSA monitored 'World of Warcraft' players
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Hillary Clinton dogged for refusing reporters' questions on book tour
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- Edward Snowden to work with Russia on anti-spy technology
- U.S. scrambles as violence escalates in Israel-Hamas conflict
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- EDITORIAL: Snipers from the left target Hillary
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq