- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Vote on Brennan for CIA post put off
On Benghazi attack, questions remain
Question of the Day
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has postponed a vote on the nomination of White House terrorism adviser John O. Brennan to be CIA director after seeing emails that showed his role in drafting controversial "talking points" about the deadly Sept. 11 terrorist attack on a U.S. diplomatic post in Libya last year.
Congressional officials told The Washington Times that committee Chairwoman Sen. Dianne Feinstein had planned to hold a vote as soon as Thursday.
But the California Democrat said this week that there would be no vote on the nomination before March 7.
"The situation is fluid," said Mrs. Feinstein's spokesman, Brian Weiss, adding that no date had been set for a vote.
White House officials told The Times on Wednesday that the emails provided to committee members, which will be shared this week with members of the House intelligence committee, show that Mr. Brennan played a minor role in drafting the talking points and none at all in making the changes that have so infuriated Republicans.
Mr. Brennan "suggested two minor edits that were stylistic," White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said. "Neither edit made its way into the CIA's final product."
Many in the U.S. intelligence community were convinced within hours that the military-style assault on the diplomatic compound in Benghazi was probably the work of al Qaeda-linked terrorists. But the talking points -- prepared three days after the event -- did not call the attack an act of terrorism and removed a reference to the attackers' al Qaeda link.
Officials have said the changes were made within the intelligence community to protect sources and methods because the evidence of the connection to al Qaeda came from highly classified electronic eavesdropping.
Republicans have contended that the al Qaeda link was deleted because it undermined President Obama's election campaign message that the terrorist network was decimated.
Several Republican senators have said they would block Mr. Brennan's confirmation if they were not allowed to see documents showing exactly how changes were made to the talking points. Two of the most vocal critics, Sen. John McCain of Arizona and Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, are not members of the intelligence committee.
It could not be learned Wednesday afternoon whether arrangements would be made for nonmembers of the committee to view the documents.
The administration hopes that making the documents available will clear a path for Mr. Brennan to be confirmed.
"The confirmation process should be about the nominees and their ability to do the jobs they're nominated for," said Ms. Hayden, the White House spokeswoman.
"As the confirmation hearings clearly showed, John Brennan is extraordinarily qualified to head the CIA, and the president needs him in place now. We face enormous national security and intelligence challenges across the globe, and to hold up these nominees for unrelated reasons is not in our national security interests."
Other committee members are concerned about the administration's legal justification for the targeted killing of suspected terrorists, including Americans.
Democrats on the committee have said they want to see legal opinions on what grounds the administration asserts the right to kill U.S. citizens without charge or trial if they are leaders of al Qaeda and cannot be captured.
The administration has shared four opinions with committee members but not their staffs, and senators want to see another seven.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Shaun Waterman is an award-winning reporter for The Washington Times, covering foreign affairs, defense and cybersecurity. He was a senior editor and correspondent for United Press International for nearly a decade, and has covered the Department of Homeland Security since 2003. His reporting on the Sept. 11 Commission and the tortuous process by which some of its recommendations finally became ...
- Senator's memo shows Iran links in Homeland Security's troubled immigration program
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- Negotiators skirt customs, make flights easier from UAE to U.S.
- Dems back bill to fix problems in investor visa program
- Democrats proceed with Mayorkas vote despite pending investigation
Latest Blog Entries
President Obama can't even organize a proper whitewash
- Calling prison term disparities unfair, Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Special ops vets slam military benefit cuts
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow