- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
Panelists at Indian museum forum team up against Redskins name
Hundreds of people gathered Thursday at the Smithsonian's National Museum of the American Indian for a discussion of sports teams’ use of racially insensitive imagery that, as such discussions often do, turned into an ongoing complaint against a certain Washington football team’s continued use of a certain Indian-inspired nickname.
Few seats were empty in the Rasmuson Theater at the museum, which hosted a daylong forum to discuss the stereotype perpetuated by American Indian mascots, who is to blame for their use, and how — or whether — the practice can be stopped.
Much of the discussion focused on the Washington Redskins.
“What better common bond can you have than a sports team you want to support wholeheartedly,” said Robert Holden, deputy director for the National Congress of American Indians. “But I cannot in good conscience support the local football team. We cannot feel a sense of community in that regard.”
The franchise has used the name Redskins since 1933, when the team played in Boston. Officials have said they have no intention of changing the name, which has been the subject of a long-running federal trademark lawsuit and several popular resolutions by local government bodies.
During a press conference before the Super Bowl, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell acknowledged that the team name can spark affection and anger, but that Redskins owner Dan Snyder was proud of the name and its heritage.
“I believe fans are, too,” Mr. Goodell said. “I also understand the other side of that. I don’t think anybody wants to offend anybody.”
“I don’t think the owners understand that they’re not honoring us,” Mr. Holden said. “If they’re still saying that, please, take it back. Honors like that we don’t need, we don’t want.”
E. Newton Jackson, a professor of sports management at the University of North Florida, said that one reason some fans have resisted changing the name is that they confuse loyalty to the name with loyalty to the team.
“A lot of institutions have not quite accepted the dialogue that there are some issues with race and ethnicity,” he said.
The issue around the Redskins‘ name recently flared up after several commentators called on the team to change it. D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray during a recent press conference avoided using the word “Redskins” while discussing whether the team would ever call the District home again and added that before any hypothetical move back to the District, he would want to sit down with the team to discuss whether a change could be made.
Eileen Maxwell, spokeswoman for the American Indian museum, said the forum had been scheduled for November but the gathering was canceled as a result of Superstorm Sandy. She said the discussion on the Redskins‘ name was not originally on the agenda, but after the recent attention, forum organizers decided to “go for it.”
“I am at a loss to fathom, why not change the name if you’re Dan Snyder?” asked Dave Price, a retired teacher living in the Crystal City neighborhood of Arlington.
“I think it’s about the almighty dollar,” he added.
Jody TallBear, a lawyer from Columbia, Md., said fans who wear the jerseys and hats are choosing to be ignorant.
“I think there’s enough out there,” she said. “It’s about personal responsibility. If people aren’t getting it at this point, they’re choosing not to get it.”
At least one fan said he changed his ways based on Thursday’s forum.
“When I walked in here, people were staring at me with my cap on,” he said. “I thought this was something good, but this Native American man came up to me and said, ‘I’m offended.’” Mr. Holland said just hours earlier he was tweeting about why it wasn’t fair to have to change the name, but after listening to the plight of so many American Indians, “it woke me up.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Meredith Somers is a Metro reporter for The Washington Times. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Three Gulf countries sink 'Noah' before movie's launch
- Lenten season marks big business for seafood sector
- ACU at 50: Strong and looking ahead
- Ready for spring? D.C. cherry blossoms to bloom by mid-April
- MOVIE REVIEW: 'Son of God'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Hillary Clinton campaign received funds from Jeffrey Thompson
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- Redskins bypass big splash - for now - as free agency period begins
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- Sharyl Attkisson resigns from CBS after months of talks
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again