- Man arrested in car bomb plot at Kansas airport
- Prison inmates take up ‘Knockout’ game, target female officers
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- John Kerry: Israel-Palestinian peace deal paved for April
- India diplomat who touts women’s rights busted for $3 wage to nanny
- MSNBC host Ed Schultz paid $252K by unions in 2012-2013
- Korean War memorial ordered to take down Christian cross
- Billy Graham near death, ‘close to going home to be with the Lord’
- SeaTac, Wash.: City’s new $15 minimum wage heads to court
- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
Va. panel nixes more absentee voting
Photo-ID measure deferred
RICHMOND — A Republican-dominated House subcommittee has again killed efforts to allow no-excuse absentee voting in Virginia and join 34 states that allow more early voting.
On party-line votes of 4-2, a Privileges and Elections subcommittee met around dawn and killed six House bills that would have allowed unrestricted early voting. Advocates said the measures would have reduced waiting times that exceeded four hours at some polling places in November.
By the same vote, the panel also killed a bill to allow parents or legal guardians of children 4 or younger, and another to allow Virginians in areas under a presidential or gubernatorial emergency declaration, to vote absentee without an excuse.
The subcommittee, however, did advance one measure that would allow Virginians 65 or older to vote absentee without citing any other reason.
One of the session's most controversial bills — an effort by Delegate Robert B. Bell, Albemarle Republican, to require photo identification for access to the ballot — was postponed to a later subcommittee meeting.
Supporters of the no-excuse absentee-voting measure — five Democrats and one Republican — said it would have addressed various concerns: more convenient hours for working families, more manageable crowds on Election Day, and the privacy of applications needed to vote absentee.
"In my district, we have individuals working two, three, sometimes four jobs, and coming to vote on a random Tuesday in the middle of the week is nearly impossible for them," said one of the sponsors, Delegate Alfonso H. Lopez, Arlington Democrat. Added flexibility of voting hours, he said, would "increase access to democracy."
A GOP sponsor, Delegate Ronald A. Villanueva of Virginia Beach, said he vouched for the bill because of daunting lines outside polling places in his district in November. He cited average wait times of more than 41/2 hours and said the measure would have made the process more efficient, though not perfect.
Delegate S. Chris Jones, Suffolk Republican who voted to kill the bill, said he backs voting on Election Day and that people who value voting will find a way.
"My wife used to go vote with a child with no problem," he said. "I work long hours, some 15-, 18-hour days. I understand that. We can't make a bill to address every issue that someone might have."
Local election registrars generally spoke in favor of greater access to absentee voting to alleviate the Election Day crush and the demands on workers at the polls, which open at 6 a.m. and close at 7 p.m. — or when the last person in line at that time casts a vote.
But some registrars also noted that the changes would come at a cost.
"We don't want to speak in opposition to it," said Jake Washburn, the general election registrar for Albemarle County. "We're for it. It may be the greatest thing since sliced bread. But it will have a fiscal impact on all registrars' offices."
Winifred Sowder of Williamsburg said that because of the tiny size of her office, increased in-person absentee voting would be burdensome.
"It's not that we don't want to do it, but I don't know where we'd get the money or where we would get the space to accommodate the citizens," Ms. Sowder said.
That drew a rebuke from Delegate Mark D. Sickles, Fairfax Democrat.
"It's a little depressing to come here and hear the people who run our elections — and I don't know what it says about us as a society — say that this is going to cost us too much to have their franchise," Mr. Sickles said moments before the vote. "If they cannot find a larger room in Williamsburg city, that is really depressing."
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- U.S. Navy-China showdown: Chinese try to halt U.S. cruiser in international waters
- Obama birther theories float as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- Billy Graham near death, close to going home to be with the Lord
- PRUDEN: The last living witnesses; they wore the yellow star and remember the Nazi terror
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Dr. Ben Carson disavows efforts at presidential draft
- STEVENS: Resisting the seduction of housing speculation
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Topics will include politics, religion, race, culture, and anything else that needs to be discussed...
Our Choice: Individual responsibility and self-government or the abandonment of the American Revolution
A stat-head’s outlook, direct from his worn in couch cushion.
John Glaser turns his pen toward foreign policy and international relations around the world
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow