- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
‘Nuclear option’ averted as Senate leaders reach agreement on filibuster rules
Liberals call move insufficient
Question of the Day
Senate leaders struck a bipartisan agreement Thursday to preserve the chamber’s filibuster but which limits how and when the minority party can use it.
The deal, which the full Senate easily approved Thursday evening, averted what could have become a poisonous parliamentary showdown known as the “nuclear option” that had Democrats changing the rules through a blunt majority vote.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, struck the deal, which preserves the filibuster but gives the majority several options for how to get bills to the Senate floor. Right now, the minority party gets two opportunities to filibuster every bill, but the new deal could limit that to just one full filibuster, depending on circumstances.
“Ultimately, this might not solve all the problems, but it is a good-faith step in the right direction. It’s done in a bipartisan fashion,” said Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat. “I think it’s a positive thing for the Senate.”
The Senate approved the rule changes — divided into two bills — by votes of 78-16 and 86-9.
Some Democrats had wanted to see bigger changes and voiced disappointment that Mr. Reid didn’t go further.
“This is not significant,” said Sen. Tom Harkin, Iowa Democrat. “It’s a baby, baby step.”
Liberal groups took Mr. Reid to task over the deal, saying he squandered a golden opportunity to usher in bold reforms in a legislative body criticized as dysfunctional.
“Today’s agreement to enact incremental reforms to Senate rules, while containing some provisions that may prove to be of significant value in mitigating the calamitous mistreatment of judicial nominations, does not go as far as we would like,” said Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice.
It takes 60 votes to overcome a filibuster — something that’s been difficult to muster amid Washington’s toxic partisanship in recent years.
Democrats have accused Mr. McConnell and fellow Republicans of abusing the tool, saying he has used it so excessively it has left the chamber mired in unprecedented gridlock. The GOP counters that Mr. Reid won’t allow any amendments on bills, breaking with Senate tradition and leaving Republicans no choice but to block the measures entirely.
Under terms of the compromise, the majority leader would have three options for bringing a bill to the floor. He could go the regular route, which would allow a minority filibuster; he could try to get agreement with Republicans, which would help him overcome an objection if it were just a handful of senators who were seeking a delay; or he could move to a bill on a simple majority vote, but would then have to guarantee at least two amendments to the minority side.
The agreement also limits the amount of time involved in filibusters of the president’s nominees.
Rule changes typically require a two-thirds majority, or 67 votes, in the 100-member Senate. But some liberal Senate Democrats pushing for sweeping filibuster reforms had pressed Mr. Reid to use the nuclear option — a parliamentary technique that could implement rule changes with only 51 votes.
Mr. Reid has said that while he had considered using the tactic, he preferred a bipartisan approach. Others in his caucus also were leery of using the maneuver because of the precedent it would set.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- McConnell to Obama: Quit fundraising, start leading on border
- Harry Reid threatens to cancel weekends
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Congress leaves Obama holding the burden of border children
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
Latest Blog Entries
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- N.J. Gov. Christie picks state A.G. to fill U.S. Senate seat
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Sarah Palin's online channel hits snag as Stephen Colbert buys similar URL
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
- Feds accept boredom, lack of work as excuses for surfing porn on clock
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world