- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Supreme Court won’t hear pro-life appeal
Group sought exemption from disclosure rules
Question of the Day
The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear an appeal from a Virginia-based pro-life group that wanted to be exempted from campaign finance disclosure regulations.
The Real Truth About Abortion Inc., which was formerly called The Real Truth About Obama Inc., wanted to stop the Federal Election Commission and the Justice Department from enforcing fundraising and advertising regulations against it.
The organization, which was formed by pro-life activists, says its “issue advocacy” amounts to constitutionally protected free speech that does not expressly advocate the election or defeat of a candidate. The group, based in Fredericksburg, also says that FEC rules defining PACs and their activity are unconstitutionally broad and vague.
A federal judge in Richmond rejected the organization’s challenge, and a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously upheld that ruling in June.
Appeals court Judge Paul V. Niemeyer wrote that the FEC “adopted a sensible approach to determining whether an organization qualifies for PAC status” and that the policy “does not unlawfully deter protected speech.”
The organization wanted to run ads on its website and on conservative talk shows before the 2008 election highlighting what it claims are Mr. Obama’s views on abortion. According to court papers, one of those ads featured an Obama-like voice saying the then-candidate favored taxpayer funding of all abortions, more money for Planned Parenthood and more liberal justices on the U.S. Supreme Court.
A female narrator then asked: “Is this the change you can believe in?”
The group continued its legal battle after Mr. Obama’s election in hopes of running ads during his re-election campaign.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Calling sentence disparities unfair, Obama pardons 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Democrats cite pope in call for minimum wage hike, jobless benefits
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Crystal Wright is a black conservative woman living in Washington, D.C.
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow