- Marionville mayor ‘kind of agreed’ with Kansas City shooter’s views
- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Teen taking selfie by train: ‘Wow, that guy just kicked me in the head’
- Goodbye, Afghanistan — hello, Africa: Air Force to shift as U.S. exits Middle East
- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
MILLER: Obama uses Zimmerman verdict to attack ‘stand your ground’
President milks Trayvon Martin death to push gun-control agenda
President Obama is milking Trayvon Martin’s death for all he can — first to stir up racial division and now to get more gun-control laws. After the Florida jury rightly decided that George Zimmerman was not guilty of murder when defending himself against the teenager’s physical assault, Mr. Obama called for overturning “stand your ground” laws in the states.
“If Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk? And do we actually think that he would have been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman who had followed him in a car because he felt threatened?” Mr. Obama asked rhetorically in an unscheduled appearance in the White House Briefing Room on July 19. “And if the answer to that question is at least ambiguous, then it seems to me that we might want to examine those kinds of laws.”
The president also questioned whether these state laws “are designed in such a way that they may encourage the kinds of altercations and confrontations and tragedies that we saw in the Florida case, rather than defuse potential altercations, if there’s a way for them to exit from a situation.”
Of course, Mr. Obama was using a hypothetical instead of the known facts of the case, an irresponsible thing for a president to do. Mr. Zimmerman was just following Mr. Martin down the street, which was not “threatening” in the legal sense.
There is no way that Mr. Zimmerman could have retreated because Mr. Martin was on top of him and beating him up on the ground. As the jury decided, Mr. Zimmerman was trapped and thought his life was in danger, so he was within his right to use lethal force to avoid being killed.
Mr. Obama, a Harvard Law School graduate, knows his theoretical case has no bearing on the justice system. He is pushing this narrative in order to prey on Americans’ lack of knowledge about the self-defense laws.
About 30 states have “stand your ground” laws on the books, but a Rasmussen poll released last week showed that half of Americans did not know whether their state was one of them. Twenty-one percent said their state did have the law, and 28 percent said it did not.
The federal courts and many state courts recognized the “stand your ground” principle for more than a century. It was based on common law, which allows someone to fight back with force when it is impossible to get away.
However, activist judges in some states created law through jury instructions that required victims to retreat instead of fighting off the criminals. This forces the innocent to make a split-second choice between running away in the hopes that the bad guy doesn’t catch up or fight back and face trial and possible prison time.
In recent years, many states that either used common law or had statutes that required retreat passed “stand your ground” ordinances modeled after a 2005 Florida act. The Sunshine State law, signed by then-Gov. Jeb Bush, was centered around the “castle doctrine,” a concept from English law that says that every man has the right to be as safe and protected in his home as a king would in his castle. Specifically, the Florida law said that you are allowed to use deadly force against an intruder in your home or vehicle when you fear great bodily harm or death.
The part of the law on which the anti-gun groups seized was the clarification that in public places, you do not have the duty to retreat. Instead, you may exercise your right to “stand your ground” when you reasonably think it is necessary to prevent death, great bodily harm or the commission of a forcible felony.
The Florida law spread across the country because people were shocked to realize that the courts might hold them responsible if they didn’t run away in the face of an attack. What seems like common sense — like not risking turning your back on an armed attacker in order to “retreat” — had to be codified.
Most people agree with these laws. Of the half of the country who knew about the “stand your ground” laws in their states, 74 percent supported the law and 16 percent opposed it in the Rasmussen poll.
Although Mr. Obama may view “stand your ground” laws as low-hanging fruit in his gun control bid, he is facing an uphill battle to persuade Americans that criminals should have more protection under the law than their victims. It is a human right to defend oneself, and “stand your ground” laws help ensure that right is upheld in America.
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek tax investigation follows D.C. conviction for muzzleloader bullet ammunition
- MILLER: Harry Reid's hypocrisy on 'Equal Pay Day': No women on top leadership staff
- MILLER: Maryland bathroom bill for transgenders is part of LGBT lobby for sex-change rights
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek surrenders to D.C. police 'Gun Offenders Registry'
- MILLER: Michelle Obama has media blackout in China while touting freedom of press
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By returning to Christian roots, the nation can achieve greatness once again
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- UNICEF launches 'Mr. Poo' mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- TAUBE: In Oregon, freedom to flash one's headlights
- TRIPLETT: Bonanza on the Eagle Ford Shale
- KEENE: The Balkans, Ukraine and the law of unintended consequences
- BOVARD: Our cluster-bomb Congress plants legislative improvised explosive devices
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Solution to Cyprus dispute is no 'mistake'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's real wealth redistribution scheme
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare numbers nothing to celebrate
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Unanswered bus-crash questions
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Lerner won't face meaningful punishment