- Atheists win prayer battle against California city council
- Americans for Prosperity ad attacks N.H. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen’s Obamacare vote
- Senate races are close in Southern states, poll shows
- Texas A&M kicks off FAA-backed drone tests for business ventures
- Bad loser: ‘Call of Duty’ gamer calls in SWAT team on teen who won
- Sen. Rand Paul: Limited Washington experience isn’t always bad
- Ben Sasse scores Sen. Ted Cruz’s endorsement for Nebraska Senate primary
- Beer-flavored lollipops make debut: ‘An All-American slam-dunk’
- Gabby Giffords’ gun control push gets high-profile speaker: Bill Clinton
- Tony Blair to warn West: Take sides against radical Islam
Issue of carbon tax rears up once again
Opponents cite cost to consumers
Business leaders joined a group of House Republicans on Wednesday to denounce a tax on carbon emissions — a concept that they acknowledge has virtually no chance of being translated into law anytime soon.
But while they’re confident such a tax has little chance of passing Congress, some Democrats and environmental groups still vehemently support it. President Obama’s recent vow to aggressively confront climate change in his second term has helped resurrect the notion, despite the long odds.
“President Obama and his minions are floating the idea, bills are being introduced,” said Rep. Joe Barton, Texas Republican, speaking at a Wednesday afternoon news conference outside of the Capitol.
“It’s part of their agenda. We’ve decided that instead of being silent, it’s better to be pro-active,” he added.
As part of that offensive strategy, Mr. Barton and Rep. Steve Scalise, Louisiana Republican and chairman of the party’s study committee, introduced a House resolution opposing “efforts by Washington liberals to install a nationwide carbon tax.”
It’s not yet clear whether the resolution will get a vote on the House floor.
However unlikely a carbon tax may be in the short term, leaders in the energy, agriculture and other sectors also are fighting to keep it from ever seeing the light of day.
Rather than attacking the idea from an environmental perspective, some opponents of a carbon tax are painting it as an attack on the American middle class.
“I think consumers are generally accepting of price increases and decreases if they’re happening in an honest market, but I think American consumers would really question why in the world the Congress of the United States would artificially increase the price of gasoline, diesel and heating oil. That’s exactly what a carbon tax would do,” said Dan Gilligan, president of the Petroleum Marketers Association of America, which represents more than 8,000 gas stations, heating oil businesses and other companies dealing the fuel.
The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, Fertilizer Institute, National Federation of Independent Business and a number of other groups also support Wednesday’s resolution.
A carbon tax certainly wouldn’t pass the House and would face an uphill climb in the Senate, but that isn’t stopping proponents of the idea.
On Tuesday, four Democrats — two from the House and two from the Senate — released a “discussion draft” of their latest carbon tax proposal. It’s not yet in legislative form and is open to public comment through April 12.
“Putting a price on carbon is the best way to reduce carbon pollution and slow the effects of climate change,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island Democrat and co-author of the draft. “For far too long, carbon polluters have pushed the true cost of their pollution onto the American people in the form of dirty air, acidified water, and a changing climate.”
While they contain many differences, the Democrats’ draft is reminiscent of the cap-and-trade legislation promoted by the White House and congressional Democrats in 2009, which ultimately failed amid bipartisan opposition. Three years later, that opposition remains strong.
The oil and gas industry is still arguing against a carbon tax, but leaders in the sector don’t believe it’s an immediate threat.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Ukraine claims torture by pro-Russian forces on the heels of Biden's stern warning to Moscow
- Joe Biden to Ukrainian lawmakers: Tackle 'cancer of corruption'
- Court rules Obama administration must justify targeted killings
- White House denies role in latest Keystone delay
- Holder to overhaul clemency guidelines, possibly freeing thousands of inmates
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Feds who send arms against ranch families betray American values
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- IRS revokes conservative group's tax-exempt status over anti-Clinton statements: report
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- Ministry of Truth: SCOTUS skeptical of law to police campaign 'lies'
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- EDITORIAL: Voting with one's feet shows folly of liberal economic policies
- EDITORIAL: Court strikes blow for campus colorblindness on affirmative action
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014