- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
- Obama ‘birther’ theories float, as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- U.S. drone faulted for killing 14 ‘innocent civilians’ at Yemen wedding
- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
Issue of carbon tax rears up once again
Opponents cite cost to consumers
Business leaders joined a group of House Republicans on Wednesday to denounce a tax on carbon emissions — a concept that they acknowledge has virtually no chance of being translated into law anytime soon.
But while they’re confident such a tax has little chance of passing Congress, some Democrats and environmental groups still vehemently support it. President Obama’s recent vow to aggressively confront climate change in his second term has helped resurrect the notion, despite the long odds.
“President Obama and his minions are floating the idea, bills are being introduced,” said Rep. Joe Barton, Texas Republican, speaking at a Wednesday afternoon news conference outside of the Capitol.
“It’s part of their agenda. We’ve decided that instead of being silent, it’s better to be pro-active,” he added.
As part of that offensive strategy, Mr. Barton and Rep. Steve Scalise, Louisiana Republican and chairman of the party’s study committee, introduced a House resolution opposing “efforts by Washington liberals to install a nationwide carbon tax.”
It’s not yet clear whether the resolution will get a vote on the House floor.
However unlikely a carbon tax may be in the short term, leaders in the energy, agriculture and other sectors also are fighting to keep it from ever seeing the light of day.
Rather than attacking the idea from an environmental perspective, some opponents of a carbon tax are painting it as an attack on the American middle class.
“I think consumers are generally accepting of price increases and decreases if they’re happening in an honest market, but I think American consumers would really question why in the world the Congress of the United States would artificially increase the price of gasoline, diesel and heating oil. That’s exactly what a carbon tax would do,” said Dan Gilligan, president of the Petroleum Marketers Association of America, which represents more than 8,000 gas stations, heating oil businesses and other companies dealing the fuel.
The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, Fertilizer Institute, National Federation of Independent Business and a number of other groups also support Wednesday’s resolution.
A carbon tax certainly wouldn’t pass the House and would face an uphill climb in the Senate, but that isn’t stopping proponents of the idea.
On Tuesday, four Democrats — two from the House and two from the Senate — released a “discussion draft” of their latest carbon tax proposal. It’s not yet in legislative form and is open to public comment through April 12.
“Putting a price on carbon is the best way to reduce carbon pollution and slow the effects of climate change,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island Democrat and co-author of the draft. “For far too long, carbon polluters have pushed the true cost of their pollution onto the American people in the form of dirty air, acidified water, and a changing climate.”
While they contain many differences, the Democrats’ draft is reminiscent of the cap-and-trade legislation promoted by the White House and congressional Democrats in 2009, which ultimately failed amid bipartisan opposition. Three years later, that opposition remains strong.
The oil and gas industry is still arguing against a carbon tax, but leaders in the sector don’t believe it’s an immediate threat.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- High court likely to allow Obama's clean-air rules
- Funding boost of $100M for mentally ill a 'small step'
- White House PR blitz hits states that rejected Medicaid expansion
- Obama tries to calm Israeli fears over Iranian nuke deal 'not based on trust'
Latest Blog Entries
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
- Broncos-Chargers game ends with several stabbings
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Kim Jong-un consolidating power or losing grip on North Korea's military
- Inside China: Ukraine gets nuclear umbrella
- Echoes of Cold War in Ukraine as Russia tries to rein in former Soviet satellites
- PRUDEN: The last living witnesses; they wore the yellow star and remember the Nazi terror
- American missing in Iran was CIA operative who went rogue - Washington Times#pagebreak#pagebreak
- Medicare pays full price for half-empty vials of medicine
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow