- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
- Detroit porch shooting trial: Suspect says he didn’t know gun was loaded
- U.S. Navy admiral ‘receptive’ to giving Chinese counterpart a tour of carrier
- Islamic State orders female genital mutilation for Mosul girls, U.N. says
- Israeli fire hits U.N. facility in Gaza, killing 15
- Obama encourages ICE to stand down, say former border agents
- Pro-Palestinian protesters attack Israeli soccer team in Austria match
- Virginia police: 2 dead after storm at campground
- Ukrainian prime minister announces resignation
- House members question $17 billion VA request
Congress closer to agreement on illegals
Question of the Day
Sen. Marco Rubio, one of the early frontrunners for the party’s presidential nomination in 2016, is part of the Senate negotiations on writing a bill.
And Mr. Paul, another early presidential frontrunner, added his name to the list of those calling for action — though he laid out his own principles for reform.
He said he wants to see an independent auditor evaluate whether the borders are secure and then have Congress vote on whether to accept that report.
Illegal immigrants now in the U.S., meanwhile, could earn “probationary” status, but wouldn’t be given any new special path to citizenship. Instead, they could take advantage of existing methods.
Mr. Paul said his plan is a middle-ground solution that could attract conservative support while granting immigrants the thing they’ve sought — the chance to live and work in the U.S. with some legal protections.
But Mr. Paul insisted his plan doesn’t grant new citizenship rights, but rather just cancels the current requirement that illegal immigrants return home and wait for years before coming back legally.
“It’s not a new pathway, it’s an existing pathway. And then what we have to figure out is if the existing pathway isn’t working, how do we fix it,” he told reporters after laying out his plan in a speech to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.
Mr. Gutierrez said he’s noticed a marked change in conversations on Capitol Hill on immigration this year — including in the House Judiciary Committee, which is controlled by Republicans.
He said even the witnesses Republicans have called during their hearings have shown “a new openness” on the part of the GOP.
“I’ve had a hard time distinguishing between who was invited by Democrats and who was invited by Republicans,” he said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Whistleblowers flood VA with lawsuits despite apology
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Astronaut shares 'saddest photo' from space: Bombs bursting over Israel, Gaza
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare enrollees faking for freebies
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq