- Florida lawmakers move to wipe corrupt ‘Boss Hogg’ town from map
- N.C. math whiz to unveil secret of March Madness picks
- An appealing offer: Chiquita merges with Fyffes to make world’s largest banana firm
- Amnesty International says Syria guilty of war crimes for food blockade
- Mitch McConnell on beating tea party: ‘We are going to crush them’
- Adam Lanza’s dad: He would’ve killed me ‘in a heartbeat’
- North Korea holds election: 100% turnout, Kim Jong-un gets — 100% of vote
- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
Colorado gun bills spark state hunting boycott; visitors pledge to head elsewhere
DENVER — Michael Bane has a piece of advice for hunters and sportsmen contemplating a trip to Colorado: Go somewhere else.
“You are crazy to come to Colorado,” said Mr. Bane, executive producer of the Outdoor Channel, on his Wednesday talk show on Down Range Radio. “It’s not worth the risk. Spend your money where your culture is. Colorado doesn’t want you here.”
Mr. Bane, who lives in Colorado, represents part of a national boycott movement aimed at the state’s $1.8 billion hunting industry, launched by gun rights supporters last week after Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper signed into law three gun control bills.
Republicans say the boycott should come as no surprise. “We warned them,” said Republican state Sen. Greg Brophy. “And it appears that the boycott is even bigger than we thought.”
Mr. Brophy said gun control proponents failed to take into account the outrage the bills would provoke, particularly in a western state with a strong history and culture of gun ownership. The timing is also bad, given that hunters are now placing their names in the lottery for hunting tags in the fall.
“The impact will be felt mostly by little communities that cater to hunting and that don’t have ski resorts,” Mr. Brophy said. “But if the hunters don’t come, or if they’re down by even 20 percent, we’re really going to feel it.”
The boycott is already taking its toll on Colorado outfitters as hunters from around the nation call in to cancel reservations. More than 60 percent of the state’s hunting revenue comes from nonresidents, who pay far more for licenses than residents.
“We’re getting a flood of emails now that the bills have been signed into law from people who say they like hunting in Colorado, they’ve hunted here in the past, but that these bills go against their beliefs,” said Chris Jurney, vice president of the Colorado Outfitters Association. “They’re telling us that now that Colorado’s becoming a liberal state, they’re not coming back.”
The state had already taken an economic hit with the expected departure of Magpul Industries Corp., an Erie-based manufacturer of polymer firearms accessories. The Outdoor Channel has also announced it will cease filming four of its popular hunting and shooting programs in Colorado.
“The bottom line is, hunters, gun owners, sportsmen, manufacturers — we’re all part of the same group, and what’s happening in Colorado is starting to snowball,” Mr. Jurney said.
Randy Hampton, spokesman for Colorado Parks and Wildlife, said the department has been contacted by hunters concerned about the new gun control measures but insisted the bills would have no impact on hunting.
“We do get people who say, ‘We’re not coming to Colorado because of these gun laws,’” Mr. Hampton said. “But there is nothing in these bills that changes their ability to hunt and fish in Colorado. What this is is a protest against the state legislature.”
Ultimately, he said he believed the hunting boycott fervor would fade. In 2012, 489,327 residents and 86,493 residents procured hunting licenses in Colorado, and “we’re still going to issue the same number of licenses, most likely,” he said.
“We have the resource. We have over-the-counter bull-elk licenses for nonresidents. You can’t find that in other states,” Mr. Hampton said. “Colorado is the elk-hunting capital of the world. There are still plenty of people who want to hunt elk.”
The boycott is designed to do more than deliver a financial hit to the state government. Gun rights advocates worry that the new laws, which go into effect July 1, are so ambiguously written that even careful firearms handlers may find themselves inadvertently running afoul of the rules.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Six Senate seats could hinge on Keystone pipeline
- Stars not aligned with polls on Keystone
- Former Greenpeace insider Patrick Moore who questions climate change says he can stand the heat
- Pot shot: GOP candidates see hit to Colorado's image from legal weed
- Arizona veto likely to chill other religious freedom bills
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Investigators puzzle: How does a 777 jetliner just disappear into thin air?
- Russia besieges Crimea as U.S. seeks diplomacy; Putin remains undeterred by Obama's sanctions
- As Crimea falls, Obama takes Key Largo golf vacation, Biden hits Virgin Islands
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- CURL: Today's GOP really is Reagan's 'Big Tent' party
- Adam Lanza's dad: He would've killed me 'in a heartbeat'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again