Less than 24 hours after senators powered their immigration bill through committee, the legislation came under fire in the House, where the former head of immigration enforcement testified that it has too many loopholes that could delay enforcement, let dangerous people in, and hamstring agents from fighting illegal immigration in the future.
Key House Republican lawmakers, meanwhile, signaled their worries over the Senate bill, saying they worried it repeated some of the mistakes of the last amnesty in 1986, which auditors said was rife with fraud and failed to follow through on promises of better enforcement.
“I cannot find any deadline by which the border is to be secured,” said Rep. Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, at a hearing called to poke holes in the Senate bill.
The three witnesses who testified included a supporter of the Senate bill, an ardent opponent, and Julie Myers Wood, the former chief of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the administration of President George W. Bush, who wants to see legalization but had concerns about the Senate bill.
All three agreed with Mr. Smith that there is no absolute requirement in the legislation that the borders be secured before illegal immigrants get legal status.
“Not within the bill, not right now,” said David V. Aguilar, former deputy commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
The witnesses were testifying before the House Judiciary Committee the day after an 867-page immigration bill cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee on a 13-5 vote.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said he’ll bring the bill to the floor in June, and key Senate Republicans have already signaled they won’t filibuster to block the bill from reaching the floor.
That sets up what’s likely to be a bruising, in-depth debate covering dozens of amendments.
“Although neither Republicans nor Democrats will support each and every aspect of this legislation, it is gratifying to see the momentum behind reforms that will make our country safer and help 11 million undocumented immigrants get right with the law,” Mr. Reid said, adding that the lawmakers who wrote the immigration bill showed “real bravery” in the face of harsh attacks, particularly from conservatives.
The crux of the Senate deal, negotiated by four Democrats and four Republicans, offers a quick legal status to illegal immigrants, but withholds a full path to citizenship until the Homeland Security Department spends more money on border security, creates a national electronic system for businesses to check their workers’ legal status, and requires a photo-based entry-exit system to check visitors’ identity.
Backers said legalizing illegal immigrants must be part of a deal, and said they don’t want to delay that legalization too long or else it will prevent people from coming forward. They argue that bringing the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants into the open will enhance security.
But Ms. Wood, who was in the administration when Mr. Bush pushed for legalization in 2007, listed a series of places where she said the current bill fails.
She said it should require in-person interviews of those applying for legalization, it should invest more in interior enforcement, and it should place stiffer requirements on the Homeland Security secretary to follow through on stiffer security.
Ms. Wood also said the bill shifts the burden for proving an illegal immigrant should be detained onto the federal government, rather than current law which presumes illegal immigrants should be detained unless there’s a good reason not to. And she said the bill creates too many chances for illegal immigrants to gum up deportations with court appeals.