- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
Obama’s drone speech welcomed by Pakistan, Yemen and the U.N.
President Obama’s pledge to scale back lethal drone strikes against suspected terrorists drew praise in Pakistan and Yemen, where almost all of the strikes take place — and from the U.N. official investigating U.S. targeted killing.
U.N. Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights Ben Emmerson said the speech should be welcomed as “a declaration that the U.S. war with al Qaeda and its associated forces is coming to an end.”
In Pakistan Friday, a statement from the foreign ministry reiterated Islamabad’s opposition to the drone program, but said the newly elected government welcomed Mr. Obama’s acknowledgement that “force alone cannot make us safer.”
It was “Pakistan’s long-standing stance that a comprehensive strategy was acquired to address the root causes that foster terrorism and extremism,” the statement said.
U.S. strikes by remotely piloted drone aircraft in Pakistan’s lawless and remote tribal belt along the Afghan border have long been unpopular in that country, where anti-Americanism and Islamic extremism are rife, and where many believe the strikes have killed thousands of innocent bystanders, although the likely civilian death toll is much lower.
The New America Foundation think tank maintains a database of the strikes, combining reports in major news media that rely on local officials and eyewitness accounts. According to their figures, the CIA and the U.S. military have carried out 416 drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen, resulting in 3,364 estimated deaths, including extremists and civilians.
Strikes in Pakistan spiked in 2010 under Obama to 122. But the rate has dropped to 12 so far this year. The CIA and the military have carried out some 69 strikes in Yemen, with the Yemeni government’s permission.
Nawaz Sharif, the newly minted Pakistani prime minister, spoke out against the drone strikes during the recent election campaign, and the country’s parliament has called for an end to the program, which is regarded by many as illegal under international law and an insult to Pakistan’s national sovereignty.
Mr. Obama, in his speech Thursday at the National Defense University said he would continue the program, but published new guidelines which he said would govern who could be targeted and when strikes could be carried out. The target must present an “imminent and continuing” threat to Americans, and there must be “near certainty” that there will be no civilian casualties.
The foreign ministry statement said Islamabad “has consistently maintained that the drone strikes are counter-productive, entail loss of innocent civilian lives, have human rights and humanitarian implications and violate the principles of national sovereignty, territorial integrity and international law.”
In his speech, Mr. Obama acknowledged that the strikes had damaged relations with Pakistan, and he praised the sacrifices of the country’s security forces, several thousands of whom have been killed in clashes with extremists and terror attacks.
“We appreciate President Obama’s acknowledgement and recognition of the sacrifices made by Pakistan,” said the foreign ministry.
Earlier this year, Pakistani officials told Mr. Emmerson, the UN rapporteur, that the civilian government had never approved the program. But Mr. Emmerson, a British barrister, said recently in Washington he could not rule out the possibility that military or intelligence officials in Islamabad had tacitly given approval to their U.S. counterparts.
On Friday, Mr. Emmerson called the president’s speech “historic.”
It should “be welcomed as a highly significant step towards greater transparency and accountability; and as a declaration that the US war with al Qaeda and its associated forces is coming to an end,” he said in a statement.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Shaun Waterman is an award-winning reporter for The Washington Times, covering foreign affairs, defense and cybersecurity. He was a senior editor and correspondent for United Press International for nearly a decade, and has covered the Department of Homeland Security since 2003. His reporting on the Sept. 11 Commission and the tortuous process by which some of its recommendations finally became ...
- Senator's memo shows Iran links in Homeland Security's troubled immigration program
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- Dems back bill to fix problems in investor visa program
- Democrats proceed with Mayorkas vote despite pending investigation
- Game players don't think peace has a chance in Syria
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- Redskins bypass big splash - for now - as free agency period begins
- Hillary Clinton campaign received funds from Jeffrey Thompson
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- Atheists sue to remove 'Ground Zero Cross' from 9/11 museum
- Sharyl Attkisson resigns from CBS after months of talks
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again