- Obama hosting annual Easter Egg Roll
- Big Bang a big question for most Americans: Poll
- Jimmy Carter’s grandson: People have right to sport Confederate battle flag license plate
- Supreme Court issues no ruling on case challenging N.J. gun law
- Sharyl Attkisson: Media Matters ‘clearly targeted me’
- Sherpas consider boycott after Everest avalanche
- Democrat Rep. Stephen Lynch on Obamacare: ‘We will lose seats’ this November
- Syria to hold presidential election on June 3
- People will be safe at 118th Boston Marathon, Mayor Marty Walsh says
- Boy Scout, 12, killed by rolling tree during troop outing at Washington park
‘Music on the Titanic’: Early reviews slam Obama’s surveillance overhaul
President Obama’s proposed changes to U.S. snooping and data-collection fell far short of what privacy advocates hoped for, and early reviews of the White House’s revamped approach have been scathing.
“The big-picture takeaway from today’s speech is that the right to privacy remains under grave threat both here at home and around the world … President Obama’s surveillance adjustments will be remembered as the music on the Titanic unless his administration adopts deeper reforms,” said Steven W. Hawkins, executive director of Amnesty International USA.
In a long-awaited speech at the Justice Department, Mr. Obama on Friday announced that intelligence analysts at the National Security Agency and elsewhere cannot query the vast pool of metadata gathered on millions of Americans without first undergoing judicial review.
Among other changes, the president also said he wants his administration, in consultation with Congress, to figure out a way to store that data outside of government hands.
But the collection of Americans’ phone records and other information will continue.
“Rather than dismantling the NSA’s unconstitutional mass surveillance programs, or even substantially restraining them, President Obama today has issued his endorsement of them,” said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, a constitutional rights attorney and executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, an anti-surveillance and privacy advocacy group. “What are billed as ‘reforms’ are mere window dressing, cosmetic change that leave this unconstitutional system intact and, in fact, provide presidential ratification.”
Some lawmakers agree with that overall assessment.
“I didn’t hear any lessening of the spying on Americans or collecting records of Americans. I heard ‘trust me, I’m going to put some more safeguards in place but I’m going to keep right on collecting every American’s records,’” said Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary?
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary Clinton?
- Obama to tour site of Washington mudslide
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
- Joe Biden's biggest gaffe: VP blowing his 2016 head start
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Twitter blocks accounts critical of Turkish government
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Jimmy Carter's grandson: People have right to sport Confederate battle flag license plate
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- CURL: Shelly O first lady Michelle Obama comes in last
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.