- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Pentagon rules under scrutiny by religious rights proponents
Question of the Day
Religious rights advocates are scrutinizing a Pentagon directive that allows service members not only to wear beards and turbans as expressions of their faith, but also gives chaplains the right to refuse practices that violate their beliefs, such as performing same-sex marriages.
Chaplains always have reserved the right to refuse services counter to their faith, but the directive issued last week clarifies the rule as the Defense Department moves forward in implementing policies for same-sex troops, legal analysts said.
“The military’s instruction is a clarification that will no doubt be useful for training and educating people,” said Robert Tuttle, a professor of law and religion at George Washington University.
The new guidance states that “in so far as practicable, a service member’s expression of sincerely held beliefs may not be used as the basis of any adverse personnel action, discrimination, or denial of promotion, schooling, training or assignment.”
After the Supreme Court struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act last year, “a number of faith organizations were concerned with chaplains being forced to perform services that could be contrary [to their faith],” said Lyman Smith, deputy executive director of the Military Chaplains Association.
“It comes down to the fact that the government is powerless to order chaplains to perform religious duties. The government has no interest in religion due to the constitutional [limitations] upon them,” said Mr. Smith, a retired Navy chaplain.
The instruction states that all requests for religious accommodations are to be handled on a case-by-case basis, and “new requests for the same accommodation are necessary upon new assignment, transfer of duty stations, or other significant change in circumstances, including deployment.”
“Overall, we’re very optimistic with caution,” said Elaine Donnelly, who heads the Center for Military Readiness. “If you really look at it, the accommodation is there to protect religious liberty. Religious expression, counseling and ministry are very, very important, and can and should be accommodated in the armed forces.”
The issue received an airing on Capitol Hill on Wednesday when members of a House Armed Services subcommittee on military personnel issues closely questioned Pentagon officials over reports that military chaplains were facing bias and restrictions for their beliefs on issues such as same-sex marriage. Some social conservative groups in recent years have tracked what they say is pressure on military chaplains to perform duties that violate their beliefs or forced to follow procedures that contradict their faith traditions.
Top civilian and religious officials in the Pentagon said they were unaware of any discrimination against traditional religious beliefs and practices, and that such discrimination would be banned even under the updated codes of conduct.
“There’s a real disconnect if things are being said to members of Congress that are not getting to the chiefs of chaplains,” Bishop James B. Magness of the Episcopal Church’s armed services office testified Wednesday, according to the Religious News Service. “I don’t have a reason for why.”
The Pentagon directive does open the door wider for service members and would-be recruits to express their faith, especially those who practice religions that require a person’s head be covered and men to grow beards.
The military for years prohibited troops from growing facial hair or wearing head coverings over concerns that a turban would make it difficult to wear combat gear and a beard would prevent a gas mask from forming a protective seal with the wearer’s face.
In recent years, however, select cases have been won by service members lobbying for religious freedom while in uniform.
In 2009 and 2010, three soldiers — Maj. Kamaljeet Singh Kalsi, Capt. Tejdeep Singh Rattan and Cpl. Simran Preet Singh Lamba — were allowed to serve while wearing turbans and beards in expression of their Sikh faith.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Meredith Somers is a Metro reporter for The Washington Times. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- No official word yet on Pope Francis visit: Archdiocese of Philadelphia
- Higher Ground: War no deterrent
- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- Humanists hit the Hill to press for 'nontheistic' chaplains
- Humanist services lacking in the military, advocates tell Congress
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- DCCC raising money on suggestion Obama impeachment is imminent
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq