- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Hillary Clinton must distance herself from Bill, Obama in 2016
White House bid requires self-defining
Question of the Day
If she runs for president, Hillary Rodham Clinton may find herself not only having to distance herself from President Obama, but she will also have to put some space between herself and her own husband, former President Bill Clinton, on everything from marijuana policy to immigration.
Policy disagreements between Mrs. Clinton and her husband, however minor, could become a major story as the 2016 presidential race heats up. It’s already clear there is daylight between the two on, among other things, infamous NSA leaker Edward Snowden, condemned by the former secretary of state but described as an “imperfect messenger” in an important debate by the 42nd president.
Then there’s Mr. Clinton’s own history during his administration, including his ramping up the war on drugs, signing the Defense of Marriage Act against gay marriage and signing into law a harsh crackdown on illegal immigration — all of which Mrs. Clinton will have to grapple with, especially in Democratic primaries.
Mr. Clinton recently tried to mop up those issues for his wife, stressing his support for same-sex marriage and saying the DOMA law he signed is unconstitutional. He’s also made clear he supports the comprehensive immigration reform bill that passed the Senate last year, an apparent evolution on the issue.
In perhaps his biggest reversal, Mr. Clinton has declared that the war on drugs has not worked. He also recently voiced support for medical marijuana.
“I think there’s a lot of evidence to argue for the medical marijuana thing. I think there are a lot of unresolved questions,” Mr. Clinton said during a recent appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program, adding that he believes the legalization experiments in Colorado and Washington should go forward.
Mrs. Clinton has expressed similar sentiments, though some advocates for legal marijuana say the former secretary of state has been more cautious in her statements about the medical benefits of pot.
Still, those apparent reversals may not be enough for some who remember how Mr. Clinton’s administration doubled down on the war on drugs by stepping up domestic enforcement and seeking to rein in narco gangs in Colombia and elsewhere.
Those efforts, he recently admitted, have failed, leading some to note the irony of Mr. Clinton’s past positions on drugs versus his positions today.
“It’s a little rich, considering his administration’s actual actions,” said Tom Angell, chairman of the Marijuana Majority, which advocates for medical marijuana use and the full-on legalization of the drug.
Mrs. Clinton “is probably going to get asked about the things that happened during his administration, and that could be problematic,” Mr. Angell added. “To be clear, that was her husband’s administration, and she shouldn’t necessarily be blamed for those actions. But it wouldn’t shock me if she was asked about them.”
By Mrs. Clinton’s own admission, there are other differences, though she’s declined to go into detail.
“I practiced law for a long time, and there’s such a thing called the marital privilege, where you do not testify against your spouse,” she told CNN in an interview last month when asked about disagreements with her husband.
Jennifer Lawless, director of the Women & Politics Institute at American University, said with a decision on running for president still months away, Mrs. Clinton doesn’t yet have to engage in detailed policy discussions about where she and her husband differ.
“Until she announces she’s running, she really doesn’t have to determine what her clear position is on anything that hasn’t already been put out there,” she said. “I don’t think it’s smart at this point for her to engage in a lot of discussion about the nuanced differences she might have with her husband or any other Democratic leader.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Russia in violation of 1987 missile treaty, White House says
- In politics, all states are 'border' states
- Libya now nation at risk with weak U.S. influence; embassy closes as chaos grows
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- White House adviser on 2016: Rand Paul more viable than Ted Cruz
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- D.C. plans to seek stay of order striking down ban on handguns in public
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq