- The Washington Times - Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Hillary Rodham Clinton brings a quarter-century of public service to her potential presidential campaign, but it’s her most recent job as secretary of state for President Obama — overseeing relations with Russia, handling the terrorist attack in Benghazi and negotiating over the war on terrorism — that could come back to haunt her.

Many of Mr. Obama’s current political problems also could affect Mrs. Clinton, including the handling of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the decision not to slap the terrorist label on Boko Haram, a group responsible for kidnapping hundreds of Nigerian schoolgirls last month.

Even the Keystone XL pipeline, which Mr. Obama has been reluctant to greenlight, went through Mrs. Clinton’s department, which delayed the project.

SEE ALSO: Bubba is certain: Hillary ‘did what she should have done’ on Benghazi

“I’m sure she’s going to go on bragging about her time in the State Department. She’s also going to have to be held accountable for its failures, whether it’s the failed reset with Russia or the failure in Benghazi that actually cost lives,” Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican and potential presidential candidate, said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”

“I don’t think she has a passing grade. If she is going to run on her record as secretary of state, she’s also going to have to answer for its massive failures,” Mr. Rubio said.

Mrs. Clinton’s supporters, who are building a fundraising and grass-roots organizing machine in anticipation of a White House run, dispute the notion that a campaign would center on her actions of the past, not on her ideas for the future.

SEE ALSO: Stop Hillary PAC prods FEC to act on complaint against pro-Clinton group

“If she chooses to run for president, she will run a campaign that is about the future and how to continue to make lives better for all Americans,” said Adrienne Elrod, communications director at Correct the Record, an arm of the liberal super PAC American Bridge 21st Century that responds to conservative attacks on Democratic candidates.

Confronting the past

While Mrs. Clinton puts off a decision on whether to run, she leaves the public discussion to her allies and opponents, and that means a heavy focus on her past.

Some questions go back decades.

Last week, after former White House intern Monica Lewinsky spoke out in Vanity Fair magazine about her relationship with President Clinton, some conservative pundits wondered aloud whether Mrs. Clinton orchestrated the story for her own political benefit.

Getting Ms. Lewinsky’s story out now, rather than during the presidential primary season, could keep the campaign focus on Mrs. Clinton’s policy proposals and qualifications, not her husband’s infidelity, some theorized.

“I really wonder if this isn’t an effort on the Clintons’ part to get that story out of the way,” Lynne Cheney, wife of former Vice President Dick Cheney, said during an interview on Fox News.

The former first lady’s age, 69, also has come into question.

Republican strategist Karl Rove has hinted that Mrs. Clinton’s hospitalization last year may have been more serious than she let on. The New York Post quoted Mr. Rove last week questioning whether Mrs. Clinton had a “traumatic brain injury” stemming from a fall in late 2012. The injury delayed the secretary of state’s testimony to Congress on the assault in Benghazi, Libya.

Story Continues →