OPINION:
I hope you followed the news with the utmost care last week. A stupendous story peeked into the media, grew to adulthood in no time, and vanished.
The news story began with the Wall Street Journal’s report that a major donor to the Clinton presidential campaign, Hong Kong-born Norman Hsu, appeared to have “bundled” vast amounts of money into donations to Democrats. Particularly blessed was the Clinton presidential campaign.
One of Hsu’s donors was the Paw family, the modest Chinese-American family of a California mail carrier whose annual salary is $45,000, but whose family has donated $244,000 to the Democrats since 2004 — $55,000 to the Clinton campaign.
So prominent has Hsu been among Clinton donors that he has been anointed a “Hillraiser,” a donor who has pledge at least $100,000 for the Clinton cause. The Journal reports Democratic sources claim his donations to the Clintons amount to “well over $1 million.”
The story gets better. Hsu’s sudden notoriety alerted California officials that he is a convicted felon on the lam since 1992. That news broke late in the week when Hsu turned himself in and posted $2 million bail. Over the weekend the story died. This week Hsu failed to show up for his bail hearing.
I suppose this is what the Clintons call “old news.” Asian money from shadowy figures has figured in Clinton campaigns going back to at least 1986. Writing in the American Spectator even prior to the Clinton campaign finance scandals of the mid-1990s, James Ring Adams followed the Riady family, an Indonesian family of Chinese ancestry then prominent among Clinton supporters and White House guests, back to Arkansas in 1986 where the Riadys played their eleemosynary role in Gov. Bill Clinton’s re-election. In autumn 1992, the family illegally pumped up to $1 million into Mr. Clinton’s presidential campaign and in 2001 paid an $8.6 million fine for its indiscretions. In that settlement, it admitted to 86 misdemeanor charges of making illegal foreign campaign contributions from 1988 to 1994. The Clintons dismiss the American Spectator as part of the “Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy,” though we have never been wrong when we made their “old news” new news.
In 1998 the Senate Government Affairs Committee report on the Clintons’ 1996 fund-raising scandal claimed “strong circumstantial evidence” that the Riadys may have illegally funneled money into the 1996 campaign. Whether they did or not, that 1996 campaign abounded with dubious Asian donors many of whom paid hefty fines for illegal contributions. Former Democratic National Committee finance chair, John Huang, pleaded guilty to felony campaign finance violations after the Justice Department estimated he arranged for some $156,000 in illegal contributions to his party.
Just to be safe, the party returned more than $1 million. Pauline Kanchanalak, a Thai businesswoman, admitted to making $690,000 in illegal contributions to the Democrats, $457,000 after a June 18, 1996, coffee at the White House with President Clinton. Charlie Trie, a former fry cook from Little Rock, was convicted of federal campaign finance violations after he donated nearly $300,000 to the Democrats in the mid-1990s and personally delivered at least $640,000 in questionable checks and money orders to the Clintons’ legal defense. Taiwan-born Maria Hsia, a friend of Al Gore’s since 1988, was convicted of arranging more than $100,000 of illegal donations to the Democratic Party during the 1996 presidential cycle from a Buddhist temple.
Yet there is more. Johnny Chung pleaded guilty to numerous felonies committed during that race. He donated $366,000 to the Democratic National Committee, $35,000 of which he admitted came from Lt. Col. Liu Chaoying of the People’s Liberation Army. Chung in May 1999 told the U.S. House of Representatives that Col. Liu introduced him to Gen. Ji Shengde, head of Chinese military intelligence, who told him, Chung testified: “We like your president very much. We would like to see him re-elect [sic] I will give you 300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to the president and the Democratic Party.”
Perhaps one reason the Clintons can dismiss so many of the scandals in their wake as “old stories” is that the Clintons are what law enforcement officials call “repeat offenders.” But I am perplexed as to why the mainstream media do not catch on.
In the Hsu stories, the press reported he is a “textile executive.” From what my reporters have been able to discover, his textile concerns have no offices and no legitimate addresses. Philip Klein found one of Hsu’s addresses for his campaign finance filings is the site of the Mid-Manhattan Public Library. Put another way, this major Democratic donor seems to have had no visible means of support. Now he is a missing person.
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is the founder and editor in chief of the American Spectator, a contributing editor to the New York Sun, and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute. His book “The Clinton Crack-Up: The Boy President’s Life After the White House” was recently published by Thomas Nelson.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.