Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

NATO will defer decision on role in Iraq

BRUSSELS — NATO yesterday put off consideration of a U.S. call for a more prominent role for the alliance in Iraq at this time, saying it is “preoccupied” with leading the international security force in Afghanistan.

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell pressed for a “greater NATO role in Iraq’s stabilization” during a meeting of the alliance’s foreign ministers in Belgium, challenging his colleagues to think about what the alliance can do to help the U.S.-led coalition.

“As we prepare for the Istanbul summit,” Mr. Powell said in reference to a June meeting of the NATO heads of state, “we urge the alliance to examine how it might do more to support peace and stability in Iraq, which every leader has acknowledged is critical to all of us.”

But NATO Secretary-General George Robertson said the response of the other allies was that “at the present moment NATO is focusing on Afghanistan,” although “no one is ruling out a wider NATO role when the time is right.”

“No decision was taken at this moment because of the alliance’s preoccupation with Afghanistan,” Mr. Robertson told reporters after the ministers’ meeting. “The NATO countries have made it clear that has to be the major priority at the moment.”

Although Mr. Powell seemed to be asking his colleagues to go to Istanbul with specific ideas about what the alliance might do, Mr. Robertson said NATO members might only begin thinking about such ideas at the summit, “if the circumstances are right.”

“Those circumstances might involve a different U.N. environment,” said Mr. Robertson, who is leaving his post at the end of the month. “They might also involve a different view of what’s happening on the ground and the desire of individual countries to do something with NATO support.”

Mr. Powell said he saw no need at this time for a new U.N. resolution on Iraq that might make it easier for other countries to legitimize their involvement in Iraq.

“There may come at time when another U.N. resolution might be appropriate, but we are not drafting one now. We see no need for a new U.N. resolution at this moment,” he told reporters at the NATO headquarters.

He argued that Security Council Resolution 1511 provided sufficient ground for “individual nations or any alliance” to contribute to the U.S.-led multinational force in Iraq.

The secretary also pointed out that 16 of the 26 current and proposed NATO nations now are part of the coalition. NATO provides logistical support for the Polish division in Iraq.

“We are looking forward to consulting with our friends in the alliance and with the secretary-general’s office here as to options for enhanced NATO participation in the Iraq mission,” Mr. Powell said.

He agreed with his colleagues that Afghanistan should be the focus of the alliance’s attention, but added that it can also think about Iraq without “losing sight of that particular vital mission.”

“Maybe at some point, we can consider that NATO will take over the responsibility for the sector that the Polish division is currently managing,” he said. “There may be broader things that NATO could do.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Republican presidential candidate and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum greets supporters Feb. 7, 2012, after speaking at a primary night watch party in St. Charles, Mo. (Associated Press)

    Santorum sweep: Wins Missouri, Minnesota, Colorado

    By Valerie Richardson and Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection uses qualified pilots to operate Predator drones for surveillance along the border. Under the FAA Reauthorization Act, drones eventually could be used by police agencies and private companies across the U.S. (Associated Press)

    Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • Supporters of gay marriage celebrate outside the James R. Browning United States Courthouse in San Francisco on Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012, after a federal appeals court declared California's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. (AP Photo/San Francisco Chronicle, Lea Suzuki)

    Appeals court rules Calif. gay-marriage ban unconstitutional

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Talk of the Web
    Happening Now