Lott, others see demise of Senate camaraderie

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

The comity once characterizing the U.S. Senate -- the so-called Senate Club that helped the chamber run regardless of which party was in control -- is dead, some senators say, and that has led to the need for change in underlying Senate rules.

Sen. Trent Lott, who as chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee will hold the first hearing on changing filibuster rules this week, put it bluntly.

"The club is dead. I'm not sure when it died, but the club is dead," said Mr. Lott, Mississippi Republican. "When I see what the club does to its own members, and to its former members now, the club is no longer here."

Those who say the Senate Club is dead point to several recent events: concurrent filibusters of judicial nominees, the use of anonymous "holds" from both parties to prevent legislation from reaching the floor and the inability to receive consent to make minor changes to speed the legislative process.

Senators and observers said the breakdown matters because some of the rules of the Senate are based on the old Senate atmosphere.

"When the underlying basis doesn't exist anymore, then the form and the ritual that express that understanding, that respect, are destined to change," said Michael McKenna, a Republican political strategist in Washington. "You can't possibly have a culture that supports a tradition like the hold or filibuster unless the culture is based on restraint -- and restraint born out of respect to your colleagues and the institution as a whole."

That's why Mr. Lott, former majority leader, said he and other Republican leaders are considering pushing several rules changes.

"We've got a problem here. Like the holds. [Democratic leader Tom] Daschle and I tried to tighten up on the holds, but the holds are still being abused," he said. "They're done in secrecy, they're done in -- what do they call it, rolling holds. It drives majority leaders nuts. In the past, a member wouldn't dare to do that to a majority leader. He would have had his chest poked by Lyndon Johnson until he couldn't walk.

"This thing has gotten to where it's all geared to stop things from happening," Mr. Lott said.