


CNN has found itself the target of criticism for misleading viewers about the types of weapons prohibited by a federal law due to expire next year.
Two CNN broadcasts last week, which featured firing demonstrations by the sheriff’s department in Broward County, Fla., suggested that firearms banned under a 1994 law are more powerful than similar, legal weapons. Yesterday, CNN admitted that was not true.
“In fact, if you fire the same caliber and type bullets from the two guns, you get the same impact,” CNN’s John Zarella told viewers yesterday.
One of the Thursday broadcasts incorrectly reported that fully automatic weapons are included in the 1994 ban on 19 types of semiautomatic rifles. Fully automatic firearms have been federally regulated since 1934.
“Either it was a deliberate attempt to fake the story, or the reporter had a complete ignorance of the story he’s covering,” said Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the National Rifle Association.
In one of the segments, Broward County Sheriff Ken Jenne introduced a detective with “an old Chinese AK-47 that has been banned.” Mr. Zarella, CNN’s Miami bureau chief, then said: “That is one of the 19 currently banned weapons.”
In fact, that weapon is not covered by the 1994 ban.
After the detective fired six shots, Mr. Zarella said: “OK. Now that was semiautomatic,” and Sheriff Jenne said: “Now this is automatic.”
The detective then fired a machine-gunlike burst at a cinder-block target, prompting Mr. Zarella to exclaim: “Wow! That obliterated those blocks. … Absolutely obliterated it. And you can tell the difference.”
Fully automatic weapons, such as machine guns and AK-47s, are regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934. They are not among the semiautomatic guns prohibited by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994.
The 1994 law — which will expire in September 2004 if Congress does not renew it — banned some military-style rifles that are semiautomatic, meaning they fire one shot each time the trigger is pulled.
The NRA and other gun rights groups say the banned guns are only “cosmetically” different than many legal types of firearms, and that the news media have consistently confused the semiautomatics with fully automatic weapons, such as the M-16.
“This whole ban was lied into law 10 years ago, and it seems to me we can do better than lying again,” Mr. LaPierre said.
Yesterday, CNN aired another broadcast that clarified which weapons are banned under the 1994 law, saying the ban is based on whether the gun has external features, such as a flash suppressor or a pistol grip.
View Entire StoryBy Timothy Stanley
Pat's suspension completes liberal network's divorce from reality

By Christina Rexrode - Associated Press
The Dow has edged teasingly close to 13,000, a marker it hasn’t reached since before ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...

By Guy Taylor - The Washington Times
U.S. and European leaders expressed optimism Friday that direct talks with Iran about its nuclear ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.

Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.

The Red Thread is written for that special tribe: adoptive families and those who hope to be.