- Marionville mayor ‘kind of agreed’ with Kansas City shooter’s views
- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Teen taking selfie by train: ‘Wow, that guy just kicked me in the head’
- Goodbye, Afghanistan — hello, Africa: Air Force to shift as U.S. exits Middle East
- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
Canada, Chile thwart U.S.-Brazilian plan
MIAMI (AP) — Negotiations to turn the Americas into the world’s largest free-trade zone hit a roadblock yesterday on the second day of talks.
Canada and Chile complained about a proposal from Brazil and the United States that supposedly was intended to make the talks smoother, according to an official with the Brazilian delegation who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Canadian and Chilean officials reached by telephone had no immediate comment.
Officials of 34 nations began meeting Sunday on a proposal to create the Free Trade Area of the Americas, which would eliminate or reduce trade barriers among all nations in the Western Hemisphere except Cuba.
In talks earlier this month, Brazil and the United States came up with an agreement that would create a base of common rules for the Free Trade Area of the Americas, but allow each country to pick which of the more controversial clauses it wishes to follow, according to a draft copy of the document.
The deal between those two countries would apparently scale back the free-trade region.
U.S. lead negotiator Ross Wilson insisted yesterday that the draft agreement was not a “retreat” from earlier efforts to create a comprehensive free-trade area by January 2005.
“No one here is talking about retreating in any significant or substantive way from the goals that have been set by the 34 nations,” Mr. Wilson told reporters.
He said there has been some debate among the nations on how to advance negotiations, but that was to be expected in all complex trade talks.
“Clearly, there are still a number of issues on the table,” Mr. Wilson said.
Brazil and the United States had been arguing fiercely about the scope of the agreement. Brazil wants the United States to reduce or eliminate subsidies, quotas, tariffs and other barriers that protect American farmers. The United States maintains that agricultural issues should be decided by the 146-member World Trade Organization.
Agricultural tariffs and subsidies are among the most contentious topics set for discussion this week in Miami.
The United States hopes to have the FTAA completed by early 2005.
Farm producers may have the most to lose — or gain. Florida orange growers have opposed Brazil’s efforts to lower U.S. tariffs on orange juice imports, while Brazil is fighting to remove U.S. import restrictions on its booming beef industry.
By returning to Christian roots, the nation can achieve greatness once again
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Judge voids N. Dakota's 'heartbeat' abortion law
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Kirsten Dunst: Actress sparks feminist ire: 'You need a man to be a man'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.