Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Biden: Gay ‘marriage’ inevitable

A leading Senate Democrat yesterday said nationwide same-sex “marriage” is inevitable, and the Republican speaker of the House conceded that congressional action to prevent such unions will be difficult.

“It’s going to be something we have to go through as part of the maturation process of the nation,” said Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., Delaware Democrat.

Mr. Biden told “Fox News Sunday” that homosexuals are entitled to the same rights as other Americans, but that getting there will “be an incredibly difficult thing for America to grapple with.”

“We’re going to go through a process here that is necessary for this nation in terms of how we deal with the rights and the recognition of gay unions. And I don’t think that gets settled by a constitutional amendment. It makes it more divisive,” Mr. Biden said.

Also appearing on Fox, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, Illinois Republican, said he supports the idea of a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman, but said Congress will not make a move until the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is tested in the courts.

That act, authored by former Rep. Bob Barr, Georgia Republican, was passed in 1996 to prevent homosexual couples from receiving federal benefits. In the event that an individual state allows same-sex “marriage,” the federal law would not require other states to recognize that union.

Mr. Barr said last week the law never was intended to tell states how to legislate on the issue and does not prohibit same-sex “marriage” at the state level.

Already, 37 states have laws against same-sex “marriages” — that they will not be performed in the state, not recognized from out of state, or both.

Only in the event that courts strike down DOMA will Congress consider a constitutional amendment, said Mr. Hastert, who predicted such a measure would pass the House but fail in the Senate. A two-thirds majority in both chambers is required for a constitutional amendment to pass and be sent to the states for ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures.

“It’s a long, hard process, and it’s difficult to do. It’s not a sure shot,” Mr. Hastert said.

Appearing on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, South Dakota Democrat, said he opposes same-sex “marriage,” but also opposes a constitutional amendment.

“The Defense of Marriage Act is a federal law. States, of course, have the right to make their own decisions with regard to how they’re going to look at marriage,” Mr. Daschle said.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last week gave homosexual couples the right to “marry,” sparking calls for Congress to pass a constitutional amendment. President Bush responded by pledging to work with Congress to defend “the sanctity of marriage.”

Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark yesterday told CBS’ “Face the Nation” that he hopes the issue does not become a “wedge” in the campaign.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaks at a caucus, Saturday, Feb. 11, 2012, in Portland, Maine. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)

    Romney wins Maine caucuses by slim margin

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • Sarah Palin, the GOP candidate for vice-president in 2008, and former Alaska governor, delivers the keynote address to activists from America's political right at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, Saturday, Feb. 11, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    Palin: Conservatives must rally to defeat Obama

    By Sean Lengell - The Washington Times

  • Republican Presidential Candidate and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) held at the Marriott Wardman Park, Washington, D.C., Friday, February 10, 2012. The annual political conference draws thousands of supporters and prominent conservative figures. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

    Gingrich: Debates without audience input? No thanks

    By Seth McLaughlin - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Talk of the Web
    Happening Now