Clinton saw no al Qaeda link to Cole

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Former Vice President Al Gore met with the September 11 commission privately yesterday, a day after President Clinton told commissioners that intelligence wasn’t strong enough to justify a retaliation against al Qaeda for the 2000 bombing of a U.S. Navy ship.

Mr. Gore met with the 10-member bipartisan commission in a three-hour meeting the panel described as candid and forthcoming. “We thank him for his continued cooperation with the commission,” the commissioners said.

On Thursday, the commission interviewed Mr. Clinton behind closed doors for nearly four hours after the conclusion of National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice’s public testimony, broadcast live on national television.

Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said yesterday on ABC’s “Good Morning America” that he believes Mr. Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al Qaeda following the ship attack.

“I think he did have enough proof to take action,” Mr. Kerrey said. “That’s a difference of opinion.”

A person familiar with the session said Mr. Clinton told the commission he did not order retaliatory military strikes after the bombing of the USS Cole in October 2000 because he could not get “a clear, firm judgment of responsibility” from U.S. intelligence before he left office the following January.

It wasn’t until after the Bush administration took power that U.S. intelligence concluded al Qaeda had sponsored the attack on the ship in the harbor at Aden, Yemen. Some commissioners have been critical of the decision not to launch a retaliatory military strike.

The source, who would speak only on the condition of anonymity because Mr. Clinton’s testimony delved into classified material, also said the former president explained the rationale for many of the terror-fighting policies that his administration instituted and the message his administration left behind for the incoming Bush administration.

Mr. Clinton “did not indicate anything fundamentally that he would have done differently” given what U.S. intelligence knew about Osama bin Laden and the al Qaeda threat, the source said.

Commission Chairman Thomas Kean said Mr. Clinton told the commission he has wrestled with the issue of whether his administration could have done more.

“He said he’s going back in his mind over and over again about whether there was something more he could’ve done,” Mr. Kean told PBS’ “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.”

The panel said it didn’t plan to release details of the meeting, saying much of it involved classified information.

Commissioners said that Mr. Clinton addressed big-picture policy issues.

“He was adamant about trying to work in a bipartisan way to fix the problems,” said Democratic commissioner Timothy Roemer, a former U.S. representative from Indiana. “He was quite honest and frank.”

Story Continues →