The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Obama team takes heat over unemployment

  • Politics

    Obama, Hill wage intel turf battle

  • World

    White House urged to end Israel row on settlements

  • Politics

    'Self-executing rule' decried as a 'trick'

  • Environment

    Poll: Fewer Americans worry about global warming

  • Politics

    Senate approves modest earmark cut

  • Security

    Napolitano shifts policy on border fence

Tuesday, April 5, 2005

Charles puts off wedding one day

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Bin Laden capture seen unlikely
  • Senate approves modest earmark cut
  • Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says

By

LONDON -- Now they will have to ditch all that celebratory crockery engraved "8 April 2005." As perhaps befitting a wedding that seemingly has been jinxed from the start, Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles won't be getting married on Friday after all.

The heir apparent to the British throne and his fiancee will have to wait one more day (assuming nothing else goes wrong) because on Friday, Charles will be in Vatican City, representing his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, at the funeral of Pope John Paul II.

Now, the prince and Mrs. Parker Bowles have decided to tie the knot at Windsor Guildhall on Saturday -- although not in the afternoon ceremony they had wanted. The Guildhall is booked solid and could fit the royal couple in only for midmorning, or maybe a bit later.

"The prince very much wanted to go to the funeral," said his communications secretary, Paddy Harveson. "He feels this is absolutely the right thing to do."

That was hardly the beleaguered and occasionally stubborn royal's first reaction. A day earlier, Clarence House, Prince Charles's London headquarters, insisted, "The wedding is still scheduled to take place on Friday," although it added, "We remain sensitive to events that are happening elsewhere."

However, it quickly became evident that had the wedding gone ahead as planned for Friday, Charles faced the embarrassing prospect of losing a number of high-profile guests, including Britain's prime minister and the archbishop of Canterbury, the head of the Church of England.

Prime Minister Tony Blair -- whose wife, Cherie, is a practicing Roman Catholic -- is determined to go to the funeral and would have passed up the wedding had he been forced to make a choice, political sources told journalists.

The same is true for Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, who is scheduled to bless the prince and his new bride in a 45-minute service at Windsor Castle's St. George's Chapel immediately after their civil ceremony.

The Charles-Camilla nuptial plans have been fraught with problems and misfortune since the announcement of their engagement six weeks ago.

Originally, a wedding full of traditional pomp and circumstance had been planned for Windsor Castle itself, until legal experts pointed out that the ceremony would have to be open to the public -- and the castle itself open to civil weddings for the next three years. The queen was not pleased.

No sooner had the forthcoming rites been transferred to the nearby Windsor Guildhall than other experts questioned whether the heir to the throne could legally marry in a civil ceremony. It is a question that still vexes numerous legal minds.

Next came humiliating word from his mother, the queen, that she and his father, Prince Philip, would not attend the wedding, although they would drop by for Archbishop Williams' blessing at St. George's Chapel.

Then there was the uproar over Mrs. Parker Bowles' royal title. She wants to be known as the duchess of Cornwall, but a government constitutional committee says that whether she likes it or not, she would become Queen Camilla when Charles becomes king -- and that it would take an unlikely change of the law to prevent it.

That has infuriated thousands of fans of Prince Charles' first wife, the late Princess Diana, and their fury has grown over the recent revelation that his second wife will automatically inherit Diana's royal title, princess of Wales, on her wedding day.

Mrs. Parker Bowles' insistence that duchess of Cornwall will suffice has far from soothed the ruffled feathers of Diana's admirers.

And to complete the montage of embarrassment, it turned out that the official engagement photograph was taken by a chef who demanded royalties.

So Prince Charles will join mourners, millions of whom will jam the Vatican on Friday for the funeral of Pope John Paul II.

Then on Saturday, he will marry Camilla Parker Bowles before an estimated three dozen guests at Windsor Guildhall. Meanwhile, nearby shops already are pondering what to do with all those plates, cups and saucers emblazoned "Charles and Camilla -- 8 April 2005."

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  2. WOLF: Questions for your representative
  3. Social Security IOUs stashed away
  4. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama nominee's sympathy for sexual sadists
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: The suicide mission for the Democrats
  2. Guilty plea may not hurt BAE's U.S. arm
  3. BLANKLEY: Our sturdy system of governance
  4. SCHATZ: Sex, drugs and BlackBerrys
  5. Temporary foreign workers threaten immigration deal

Most Commented

  1. GOP to use amendments as tactic
  2. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  3. Obama hones final health care pitch
  4. Temporary foreign workers threaten immigration deal
  5. Justice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs
More Top Stories »
  1. GOP blasts Democrats over health bill tactic
  2. Obama humanizes health debate in final push
  3. GOP move on pork pressures Obama
  4. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  5. PRUDEN: The suicide mission for the Democrats

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Slaughter says her solution is 'constitutional'

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.