

Federal prosecutors say D.C. Council member Marion Barry deserves to be “prosecuted and punished” and faces 12 to 18 months in prison for failing to file income-tax returns under federal sentencing guidelines.
In addition, Mr. Barry “has not filed his delinquent tax returns; nor has he submitted drafts of those returns,” prosecutors yesterday said in a memo to U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson.
Mr. Barry, the former four-term D.C. mayor, pleaded guilty last year to misdemeanor tax charges for failing to file federal and local returns on more than $500,000 in income from 1999 to 2004. He is scheduled to be sentenced tomorrow in U.S. District Court in the District.
Under a plea deal with Mr. Barry, prosecutors said they will take no position on his expected request for probation.
But in the memo to Judge Robinson, Assistant U.S. Attorneys James W. Cooper and Thomas E. Zeno said the federal “government is unable to abide by its promises regarding sentencing unless and until defendant Barry satisfies this obligation of the plea agreement.”
The prosecutors noted that Mr. Barry had agreed to file all delinquent returns and arrange for payment of all taxes and penalties to the Internal Revenue Service, the D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue and any other required tax authority.
They also pointed out that a pre-sentence investigation report in the case has calculated a sentencing guideline of 12 to 18 months in prison, based on the offense and Mr. Barry’s criminal history. The Ward 8 Democrat served six months in prison after his arrest in 1990 following an FBI sting that caught the former mayor smoking crack cocaine.
“The government agrees this calculation is accurate,” prosecutors say in the memo.
Mr. Barry’s attorney, Frederick D. Cooke Jr., declined to comment, saying neither he nor his client want to discuss the case before appearing in court.
Attempts to reach Mr. Barry were unsuccessful.
In the memo, prosecutors say Mr. Barry, 69, tested positive for cocaine and marijuana use Nov. 17 and warn of “sanctions, such as revocation of release,” if Mr. Barry tests positive again.
Federal judges are expected, but not required, to abide by sentencing guidelines, according to Randall Eliason, former chief of the public corruption unit in the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
“Judges are expected to follow the guidelines unless they’ve got a good reason not to,” he said. “It’s going to be up to Barry to give the judge some reason why the sentencing guidelines shouldn’t be followed.”
Disclosures that Mr. Barry has tested positive for drugs and failed to file his returns “certainly won’t help his case,” Mr. Eliason added.
Prosecutors say Mr. Barry’s failure to file tax returns reflects “a conscious decision, not an oversight.”
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times
A 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday on accusations he planned to detonate a suicide ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A collection of Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. to the beyond

Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.