Officials seek more state cash for roads

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

Northern Virginia leaders yesterday told Gov. Timothy M. Kaine that the Republican-driven transportation deal must be amended so that the state, not localities, shoulders more of the financial and political burden of building new roads.

Elected officials from Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun and Prince William counties complained that the plan primarily relies on allowing Northern Virginia localities to raise about $400 million for roads if they agree to raise local taxes and fees, but that it offers little in additional state assistance.

The officials suggested the state should assume the responsibility of charging a proposed $100 fee on most Northern Virginians seeking their first driver's license and remove language in the plan that requires localities to maintain secondary roads if they join the proposed regional taxing authority. Republicans say the language can be fixed.

Elected leaders also recommended lowering the proposed tax increase on commercial real estate, saying they fear the increase could hurt the same regional economy that serves as a financial engine for the state.

They said that loss could be offset with the additional taxing options contained in the proposed Hampton Roads' regional plan, which includes the ability to raise the local gasoline tax.

"The same sources of revenue for Hampton Roads ought to be made available for Northern Virginia," Gerald E. Connolly, chairman of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, said after meeting behind closed doors with Mr. Kaine in Fairfax.

Corey A. Stewart, chairman of the Prince William Board of County Supervisors, said that if Mr. Kaine became more willing to use more general-fund revenue -- primarily state sales and income taxes -- for transportation, then the General Assembly should consider "as a compromise" a statewide gasoline tax increase that would return the money to the localities where the funds originated.

"We cannot stomach any longer a failure here," Mr. Stewart said. "We are desperate. It is damaging our quality of life and it is hurting our economic-development prospects as well."

Loudoun County Board of Supervisors Chairman Scott K. York said that his primary concern is that the revenue raised in his county through the new taxing options would stay in the county. Mr. York said he also is concerned that "currently, the mix is 100 percent for us to raise and zero on the state."

"From my perspective, the state needs to be a 50-50 partner in this," he said.