Obama, McCain air moral, ethical views

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

LAKE FOREST, Calif. | Barack Obama” href=”/themes/?Theme=Barack+Obama” >Sen. Barack Obama Saturday said that defining when life begins is “above my pay grade,” but added he would work to promote adoptions, as he and John McCain” href=”/themes/?Theme=John+McCain” >Sen. John McCain spilled their souls in what amounted to public confessions to one of the nation’s top evangelical leaders.

Mr. McCain was unequivocal in his answer to the question of when a baby acquires human rights, saying “at the moment of conception,” before going on to tout his pro-life voting record and to promise a pro-life administration and pro-life judges.

The two men shared their first handshake — and hug — of the campaign as Mr. Obama left the stage and Mr. McCain took his seat at a Saturday night faith forum, sponsored by the Rev. Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church here and an emerging leader for a broader evangelical movement.

Mr. Obama said Justice Clarence Thomas “was not a strong enough jurist or legal thinker” to have been nominated to the Supreme Court, and said to applause he thinks that “marriage is the union between a man and a woman,” but that states should be allowed to make their own definitions.

In a manner reflecting his brusque style, Mr. McCain said without elaboration that his greatest personal failure was the collapse of his first marriage, an event for which he has often taken responsibility. He also repeatedly talked about his Christian faith having been forged by his experiences in a Vietnamese prisoner of war camp.

He said the greatest failure of the country has been in not stepping up to its challenges, and he even took a swipe at President Bush, saying the country took the wrong attitude after the September 11 terrorist attacks, when Mr. Bush famously told people to boost the economy by shopping.

“I think after 9/11, my friends, instead of telling people to go shopping or take a trip, we should have told people to join the Peace Corps, AmeriCorps or the military,” he said.

After “values voters” were credited with delivering a re-election victory to Mr. Bush in 2004, Democrats vowed to fight for those voters, and Mr. Obama senses an opening this year, particularly among younger evangelicals who, their leaders say, are looking beyond abortion and marriage to other issues, such as AIDS, poverty and the environment.

Underscoring the importance of those voters, it took Mr. Warren, author of “The Purpose Driven Life” and who some have likened to the Rev. Billy Graham, to get the two candidates together on the campaign trail for the first time since they all but secured their respective parties’ nominations.

The fact that this was the first such meeting was a reminder of how the rest of the campaign this year has been fought through television commercials, press releases and speeches, and how most coverage has focused on the two men’s attacks and gaffes. Mr. McCain had challenged Mr. Obama to a series of 10 face-to-face town-hall meetings, but the Democrat rejected that idea.

Still, Mr. Obama said that Saturday’s forum was the kind of discussion the two men should be having and the country needs.

It was more Oprah Winfrey than Lincoln-Douglas, as Mr. Warren prodded both candidates to open up on their own failings and their framework for addressing issues and problems. He had the same script of questions for both men, and so, as a result, Mr. McCain was kept in a soundproof environment while Mr. Obama was on for the first hour in the two-hour program.

Mr. Obama swerved away from revealing too much, saying his biggest political change from 10 years ago was on welfare reform, which he said worked better than he thought.

And questions on abortion, a major stumbling block he faces with evangelicals and other religious conservatives, seemed to stump Mr. Obama: He couldn’t name a time he’d voted to reduce abortions, and couldn’t define at what point a human life has rights, instead saying he is pro-choice, but recognizes that there is a moral and ethical dimension to the issue and respects those who think life begins at conception.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus