- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
Obama promises convention role for veterans
Question of the Day
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. | Sen. Barack Obama on Monday blasted his Republican rival for falling back on attacks and said veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars will play a prominent role at next week’s Democratic convention.
“We shouldn’t be surprised; they’ve been doing this every election,” Mr. Obama said. “That’s what they do. That’s their politics. They don’t know how to govern, but they know how to run a negative campaign.”
Mr. Obama’s comments came after Sen. John McCain, addressing the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention in Florida, said he “would rather lose an election than lose a war,” and suggested Mr. Obama feels the opposite way because of his “ambition to be president.”
During a town hall here, Mr. Obama cited the McCain remark: “John McCain himself personally said that I would rather lose a war so I could win an election.” The enthusiastic crowd booed at the mention of the Republican.
Mr. McCain, a decorated Vietnam War veteran who endured torture as a prisoner of war, also attacked Mr. Obama’s opposition to the surge of troops to Iraq in 2007.
“A lot of people are still trying to square Senator Obama’s varying positions on the surge in Iraq,” he said at the convention in Orlando, Florida. “Not content to merely predict failure in Iraq, my opponent tried to legislate failure.”
He said the decision whether to support the surge “was a moment when political self-interest and the national interest parted ways,” noted that supporting it was, for him, “an easy call,” and said Mr. Obama is a flip-flopper for now acknowledging the surge has helped reduce violence.
“Senator Obama still cannot quite bring himself to admit his own failure in judgment,” Mr. McCain said. “Senator Obama commits the greater error of insisting that even in hindsight, he would oppose the surge. Even in retrospect, he would choose the path of retreat and failure for America over the path of success and victory. In short, both candidates in this election pledge to end this war and bring our troops home. The great difference is that I intend to win it first.”
Mr. McCain opined that the reason for Mr. Obama’s shift was “the ambition to be president,” but said, “what’s less apparent is the judgment to be commander in chief.”
Mr. Obama regularly says he had the good judgment to oppose the war back in October 2002.
Mr. Obama, who held two events here Monday before heading to Florida for his own speech to the VFW on Tuesday, announced a new collective of supporters - veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
“Next Generation Veterans for Obama” will stump for the Democrat across the country, according to the campaign.
A Center for Responsive Politics analysis last week found Mr. Obama had received far more campaign contributions from active military - by a ratio of 6 to 1.
Team Obama also hit back at the McCain VFW speech, calling it “bluster.”
“It is hard to understand how Senator McCain can at once proclaim his support for the sovereign government of Iraq and then stubbornly defy their expressed support for a timeline to remove our combat brigades from their country,” Obama spokesman Bill Burton said. “The difference in this race is that John McCain is intent on spending $10 billion a month on an open-ended war, while Barack Obama thinks we should bring this war to a responsible end and invest in our pressing needs here at home.”
About the Author
Christina Bellantoni is a White House correspondent for The Washington Times in Washington, D.C., a post she took after covering the 2008 Democratic presidential campaigns. She has been with The Times since 2003, covering state and Congressional politics before moving to national political beat for the 2008 campaign. Bellantoni, a San Jose native, graduated from UC Berkeley with ...
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world