- No mas: Principal bans Spanish language in intercom announcement
- Hacking software could put ‘zombie drone army’ in user’s hands
- Support for stricter gun laws drops: poll
- 10 whales dead, 41 others stranded in Everglades
- John Boehner faces bipartisan pressure to allow gay-rights vote
- Martin Bashir resigns from MSNBC over ‘ill-judged’ comments about Sarah Palin
- Rep. Duncan Hunter: While Obama prays for Iranian change, U.S. should ready its nukes
- Best company ever? Veteran Beer Co. exists to employ vets, provide quality beer
- Iran official: Sanctions ‘utterly failed’ to stop nuclear program
- ‘Black Santa’ display at IU sparks student outrage
Obama promises convention role for veterans
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. | Sen. Barack Obama on Monday blasted his Republican rival for falling back on attacks and said veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars will play a prominent role at next week’s Democratic convention.
“We shouldn’t be surprised; they’ve been doing this every election,” Mr. Obama said. “That’s what they do. That’s their politics. They don’t know how to govern, but they know how to run a negative campaign.”
Mr. Obama’s comments came after Sen. John McCain, addressing the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention in Florida, said he “would rather lose an election than lose a war,” and suggested Mr. Obama feels the opposite way because of his “ambition to be president.”
During a town hall here, Mr. Obama cited the McCain remark: “John McCain himself personally said that I would rather lose a war so I could win an election.” The enthusiastic crowd booed at the mention of the Republican.
Mr. McCain, a decorated Vietnam War veteran who endured torture as a prisoner of war, also attacked Mr. Obama’s opposition to the surge of troops to Iraq in 2007.
“A lot of people are still trying to square Senator Obama’s varying positions on the surge in Iraq,” he said at the convention in Orlando, Florida. “Not content to merely predict failure in Iraq, my opponent tried to legislate failure.”
He said the decision whether to support the surge “was a moment when political self-interest and the national interest parted ways,” noted that supporting it was, for him, “an easy call,” and said Mr. Obama is a flip-flopper for now acknowledging the surge has helped reduce violence.
“Senator Obama still cannot quite bring himself to admit his own failure in judgment,” Mr. McCain said. “Senator Obama commits the greater error of insisting that even in hindsight, he would oppose the surge. Even in retrospect, he would choose the path of retreat and failure for America over the path of success and victory. In short, both candidates in this election pledge to end this war and bring our troops home. The great difference is that I intend to win it first.”
Mr. McCain opined that the reason for Mr. Obama’s shift was “the ambition to be president,” but said, “what’s less apparent is the judgment to be commander in chief.”
Mr. Obama regularly says he had the good judgment to oppose the war back in October 2002.
Mr. Obama, who held two events here Monday before heading to Florida for his own speech to the VFW on Tuesday, announced a new collective of supporters - veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
“Next Generation Veterans for Obama” will stump for the Democrat across the country, according to the campaign.
A Center for Responsive Politics analysis last week found Mr. Obama had received far more campaign contributions from active military - by a ratio of 6 to 1.
Team Obama also hit back at the McCain VFW speech, calling it “bluster.”
“It is hard to understand how Senator McCain can at once proclaim his support for the sovereign government of Iraq and then stubbornly defy their expressed support for a timeline to remove our combat brigades from their country,” Obama spokesman Bill Burton said. “The difference in this race is that John McCain is intent on spending $10 billion a month on an open-ended war, while Barack Obama thinks we should bring this war to a responsible end and invest in our pressing needs here at home.”
About the Author
By Tom Harris and Madhav Khandekar
Bad science puts rich nations on the hook for trillions in climate liabilities
- Angry NTSB ousts railroad union from N.Y. train crash site
- Hola: Boehner prepares to push amnesty bill through House
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- Puerto Rico caravan honoring Paul Walker ends in 6 drunken-driving arrests, 72 speeding tickets
- Apple wins facial recognition patent for iPhone 6
- Xbox One, Playstation 4 games penalize users for cursing in their own homes
- First Dog Sunny knocks down Ashtyn Gardner; Michelle Obama yanks leash
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- HURT: Postal Service misses address by a whole continent
- Allen West warns Obamas backdoor gun control is moving forward
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Does it take over 25 years in public service to really know what goes on in Washington?
Despite cynicism about the law, it can provide you justice, protection, and ensure your rights.